Is character asassination and slandering of the dead acceptable ???

Why wherent these allegations made whilst he was alive to defend himself ???

Apparently plenty were made, but no one wanted to listen.

Plenty more were made too.

So allegations were made and investigated by the CPS but nothng proven.

So the likes of Gambaccini and Rantzen wait till he is dead to jump on the band wagon.

Bill Wyman started his "relationship" (whatever that may have entailed) with Mandy Smith when she was 13

seem to remember allegations in the sunday papers back in the late 70's/early 80's

Yes it would seem so...by newspapers, his employers (BBC), and the police. None of which were proven.

Justice didn't always come to the fore in the 70's

Steady on here folks...

For the legal bods - is it possible to slander/liable the dead?

Well I imagine his family won't be very pleased about it.

apparently not

I'm interested to see what allegations are made in the documentary and what evidence is given - you'd normally expect the most damning evidence to be saved for the program itself but for the warm-up adverts to at least give a taste of whats to come, at the moment its an ex-BBC employee saying that she saw "a girl who was obviously 14 sitting on his knee".

Obviously 14 ?

It all sounds a bit flimsy at the moment and I hope for the sake of the pre-release publicity and for Esther Rantzen's name that there is a bit more to it than has been released so far.

While I always thought he was a bit "strange" particularly after the Louis Theroux documentary I think that you also have to put some of these allegations into date/time context and some may find that impossible to do if they don't remember what the 1960s and 70s were like - if indeed these allegations date from that time.

Rape, sexual abuse and grooming of under-age girls was as prolific as it is now, it was just never spoken of and never publicised like it is now especially in the context of a "relationship" no matter how flimsy the "relationship", the treatment of females in the media as sexual objects of gratification was prolific in the 60s and 70s and you need to fully understand that as "the norm" before you judge a young man who may have simply been accepting what was on offer at every event he attended - there will be a lot of twitchy bums amongst sixty and seventy year old ex-pop stars going on right now if old coals are going to be raked over in this way.

I'm not defending him at all, but I find the timing of this expose to be strange, I can believe that he may have held some power over the media in the 1970s but he effectively retired from public life for the last two decades - why wait until he can't answer the allegations and why did the police find nothing five years ago ?

It all sounds like a lot of foul publicity to me but we shall see the "evidence" on Wednesday.

In other words .... Jangle Jangle, Jury Jury ?