[quote="Jack Burton":28chrmx1]Unless they can get significant investment into Odsal, they should move to Valley Parade.[/quote:28chrmx1]
Valley Parade owners wanted £750k a season so that was a non-starter. We're stuck with the Odsal millstone unfortunately since finding someone with tens of millions needed has been impossible since the 1930s.
Valley Parade pitch is smaller than Odsal BTW. Odsal pitch has a dispensation to be the size it is. Length wise it's no different to many RL grounds.
[url][/url][quote="Bullseye":2n6si5e2]Valley Parade owners wanted £750k a season so that was a non-starter. We're stuck with the Odsal millstone unfortunately since finding someone with tens of millions needed has been impossible since the 1930s.
Valley Parade pitch is smaller than Odsal BTW. Odsal pitch has a dispensation to be the size it is. Length wise it's no different to many RL grounds.[/quote:2n6si5e2]
Not sure how you get that.
Valley parade is reported as 64 metres wide
[quote="STEVENM1000":45afcy7a][url][/url]Not sure how you get that.
Valley parade is reported as 64 metres wide[/quote:45afcy7a]
It's shorter than it was when we were last there apparently - and that needed a dispensation then.
No idea what the answer is for Bradford , given the financial pressures facing the game, ground sharing needs looking at more widely in the sport.
Share a ground with Halifax? Share the new Ken Davy ground, Share Headingley, I know this will bring Bradfordians out in hives , would probably do same for me.
On our game, 1,310 in attendance is abysmal and emphasises the game’s income challenge, see above share costs suggestions
[quote="Bullseye":2yu06y3o]It's shorter than it was when we were last there apparently - and that needed a dispensation then.[/quote:2yu06y3o]
Good lord ! Has the metric wheel not reached Bradford yet
City Of Culture and small playing surfaces.
All views expressed are those of the author and not necessarily those of the RLFANS.COM or its subsites.
Whilst every effort is made to ensure that news stories, articles and images are correct, we cannot be held responsible for errors. However, if you feel any material on this website is copyrighted or incorrect in any way please contact us using the link at the top of the page so we can remove it or negotiate copyright permission.
RLFANS.COM, the owners of this website, is not responsible for the content of its sub-sites or posts, please email the author of this sub-site or post if you feel you find an article offensive or of a choice nature that you disagree with.