New points based changes. Makes sense to me. Points received for each charge per grade Grade A: 1 point Grade B: 3 points Grade C: 5 points Grade D: 12 points Grade E: Refer to Tribunal Games missed 6-11 points: one-match ban 12-17 points: two matches 18-23 points: three matches 24-29 points: four matches 30-35 points: five matches 36-38 points: six matches 39-41 points: seven matches 42-44 points: eight matches 45-47 points: nine matches 48-50 points: ten matches 51-53 points: eleven matches 54+ points: twelve matches

It's the same clowns determining if there is an offence and the grade. The new system doesn't address the utter lack of consistency. And the 5 points added for an unsuccessful appeal, regardless of the strength of evidence provided, suggests a panel uncomfortable with even a modicum of scrutiny and challenge.

Do we have anything to explain what each grade offence is please.

I think it's similar to the NRL system

I'm sure that with Connor, Newman, Bentley and Lisone in the side, we'll be appreciating the finer points of this system soon enough. Although maybe losing Martin has a silver lining in this regard. Discipline is certainly one area that we've been terrible in (irrespective of coach) in recent years.