He's just turned 20, RT. He's been a let down by a reserves system that only allows him to play every other week against kids. When he does get to play for the 1st team it's generally been in a decimated side behind a undersized pack. This year, I'd let Connor and Frawley fight it out in the halves (I'd start with Connor) and find Sinfield a championship club on a season long loan where he can play every week. At the end of that time we can make a proper judgement on him. I think that's a sensible strategic approach.

I don’t disagree with your comments, I think playing week in week in championship but being able to recall into first team should it be required can only be a good thing, make or break year though, if by then end if the year he’s not taken or ready to take Frawleys place for 2026 then its time to mice on

I just don’t think he looks anywhere near a Leeds std player I just don’t think he has “it”

Sinfield looks like he's more of an organiser type potentially. That is likely to work far better with the sort of team Arthur is building than under Smith, as we'll see a much more structured gameplan next season.

I'm dubious about Sinfield's potential as well but developing half backs is the hardest thing to do. He desperately needs a run of games so everyone - including Jack himself - can see whether he can make it. There's very little point from a development point of view in him playing five sporadic games for us next year when someone is injured. It really is getting to make or break time for him.

Also playing next to Croft, with a decent sized pack moving forwards and some strike out wide should make him look better. Sinfield and Croft could work on style, sinfield and Frawley is a horrible mix.
Harry smith is the type of model Sinfield should be looking at. Kick, kick and kick, pick the right pass most the time and half decent in defence.

Palasia 18th man today sadly