I can't speyk.

Saints appealing Knowles ban, wouldn't surprise me if the MRP reduce the 2 to 0 and give one to Martin just for the hell of it....


Can't get on the RFL site, how many did Bateman get?

One word…frivolous.

On what grounds can they appeal? In the words of Christian Wolfe 'I’m flabbergasted'

Bateman reffered to tribunal I think, so 4+?

‘’The 21-year-old received a zero-match penalty notice for a late hit against Huddersfield Giants in July but a grade A charge only carries a ban if the player has been found guilty of two or more offences in the previous two years’’

there was absolutely nothing wrong with Welsby's tackle. Just another example of how soft the game has become ps I didn't agree with Martin's ban , that was ridiculous too.

no. i thought it was ok too

Shouldn't even have been looked perfectly fair tackle

Well the review panel have called it a high tackle. I don't want tackles like that banned either but if they were consistent at all he wouldn't be playing on Saturday and that's what's a joke
.

Lets get on with the game now we can argue about previous wrong decisions but for once I think they have called it right this week. Saints appealing has to be deemed frivolous after the Martin verdict. Its a free hit for Saints as its England games he will miss if ban extended.