Hmmmm this hasn’t aged well

Apologies it was badly worded, a similar tack to one that ended a players career.

What’s pathetic is bringing Rob Burrow into this. And that’s me being kind.

Was the tackle because fages was deliberately being targeted- yes, was that a tactic of the game - yes. Was that the same last time yes- clearly because three players were banned after the game all for tackles on the same player- not a coincidence!
Have I called players out for high tackles- if I feel they are done deliberately then yes I would certainly do that. Given our record I can’t say there’s a pattern- unlike Leeds- who are top of the pops in bans.
Is pryce a house? The jury is still out as I’ve yet to see enough of him he’s played just 12 games this season but IMO He’s an extremely overhyped player who can’t tackle, has poor technique and needs to sort out his petulant attitude.

Theo Fages??
Come on Jools - he's hardly Wally Lewis.
Can't see us deliberately targeting him.
And if we did, would we really pick Sezer to do it?
This really is a ridiculous discussion.

Tackle was slightly late. Head clash. One game ban. We'll take it.
Let's just move on.

Cool story, shame it's make believe.
Assuming it's the April game you're on about, Tetevano was our only player that was banned.

Sezer acted as any edge defender would when caught out. He shot in and got it ever so slightly wrong. Happens all the time. The ban is a bit harsh but in line with what we’ve seen this year. I’m sure Sezer will cop more of those than he gives out.

To bring Rob into this is not only below the belt it’s ludicrous.