We don’t play HKR next so how does this help us? Apart from once again highlighting that a referee missed two sending off offence’s!

In this case it does actually help us as we need Hull KR to keep losing - but I get your sentiment

No disciplinary action against us? There's a novelty!

In the lead up to Gannon's try where he picked the ball off the ground Austin bumps into the KR player who dropped the ball to keep him out of the play. The contact is more deliberate than Martin's the previous week. It also lacks force but the only difference is the KR player doesn't fall over as a result of the contact. Hopefully the derision over the Martin ban has some effect. Neither was worth a penalty let alone a ban.

The Austin won, the opposition player was still kind of juggling with the ball, and Austin pushes him just as it starts to fall away from him, and Austin commuted cannot just stop, its all split second stuff, and a push is not illegal on the ball carrier, Austins perfectly allowed to do that. But i thought they might pull him for it, but as you say maybe the Martin ban which no one in the game accept the MRP thought was worthy of a penalty or a ban.

The mrp cant do this year on year, 13 players banned again this week. They think it'll serve as a warning and clean the game up but it won't, most of these 'incidents' are inevitable due to the nature of the game and the expectations to compete at the highest level.

That will kill the game in this country if it continues in the future seasons, something needs to be done.

Assuming Corey Norman gets 8 matches for his grade F, it will be a total of 25 match bans across 13 players from a single round of super league

I mean in the case of Norman, some are legitimate.

Though also makes you wonder how Holroyd got more than an incident that amounts to an act of rape.

No indication as to the severity of Harrys hamstring injury just that it's not the same injury as before but it also sounds like an opp won't be needed.