God we arent still going on about Tetevano's ban surely? The club accepted the ban without appealing.

Thought it was sending iff sufficient, Hardakers was a bit worse but neither were Steve Hampson on Gary Freeman.

Joel Tomkins 4 match ban for his return fire after the 'headbutt'. Oh dear. Nevermind.

I hope we don't need a discussion on Tetevano's ban every time an opposition player goes to the disciplinary. Let it go folks.

2 for Hardaker and 4 for Tomkins sound about right to me having watched the incident a few times.

Quite, all of those are in the bounds of where they should have been.
The lack of understanding about the disciplinary and the criteria/charges/punishments handed out was painful when Tetevano was banned, regurgitating the same incorrect statements every time there is a big disciplinary decision in some attempt to make Leeds the victims is tedious indeed.

Sinfield was indeed two games, arguably for worse than what Hardaker did although his track record was of course essentially perfect. It did, however, get him back in time for a Cup semi final, which we won - and the conspiracy theories about that from opposition fans were very loud indeed!

Just had a little spring clean of the thread as being such an obvious "emotive" thread (ie everyone hates Leeds) it was getting a bit, Fruity.

May I direct you to our lovely "Provocative Posting" linky and may I ask people to have a good old read of it please.
Linky - rlhttps://forums.rlfans.com/viewtopic.php?f

No bounce, no play.