Quote Gotcha="Gotcha"I would bet money on it Marty that the quoted losses include the planned debt paybacks for the stands, etc. Typical Hetherington basically with what he releases, to ensure accepted.
You have to wonder how Saints are run so well, on a much smaller catchment area, a new stadium, smaller revenue streams, and still spend on team resources. Their coach won't have come cheap either, unlike us utilising one guy for three roles.
There is no doubt the last few months, and ongoing for a period are going to have an hit on every type of business, and of course Rugby is really in the hospitality industry which is harder hit still. However, they have also had the luxury, and not quite about telling us, that they used the furlough scheme to the full. Considering the biggest cost of the club is the people, that is quite a saving, even without the revenue in.'"
St Helens have owners who have pumped in about £20m to build the stadium and to prop them up operationally over the past 10 years or so. They have no prospect of seeing any of that money again.
Leeds would be amazingly run by this metric if Caddick was so inclined. However over the past 20 years there hasn't been much need for Caddick funding, and as we know to rebuild the north and south stands commercial, albeit council-backed, funding was required.
This then is the key question, the club's owner has been happy to enjoy the prestige of the good times, and yes has at times used Leeds as a bank to provide cash to other parts of the Caddick empire, in particular, when it was co-owned, the union club. Hetherington and Oates also got very large sums a couple of years ago which are in theory repayable. Will they be willing or able to provide funding now that the club is in a very difficult position that might last for three or four years?