London beat us by the golden point.. I don't suppose the fact that we had six first reamers rested made any difference then???

I think you missed the point.

Im fully behind most of the changes but i wouldnt shift Walker he's still learning his FB role to change that now would be a wasted gamble.
Unfortunately we are stuck with one of Myler Lolohea Sutcliffe in one of the HB roles for now to partner Mclellend.
Also Goldings firmly on the outer so i cant see that changing either.

We are in serious trouble and the most obvious weakness to correct is the lack of decent halfbacks. The combinations of Myler and Sutcliffe simply do not work and the biggest gamble would be to keep playing them in these positions. Myler needs a break from the pressure and Sutcliffe is at best a backrower on the bench to cover several positions.

I accept your point about Walker changing roles. But he is young, talented and adaptable and IMO has the skills to turn some of the opportunities close to the line into tries on last plays. Playing at 6 he would get his hands on the ball more times and not have to do the physical work of clearing our own lines.

McLelland has a better kicking and passing game than Myler or Sutcliffe and could do the organising leaving Walker to do what he does best ie run at the opposition and his footwork would produce wins where at present we are producing losses. Both are not scared to tackle and would do better than Myler & Sutty

The team has shown a much better attitude and work rate which has improved our defense dramatically. Now we need to address the woeful lack of ideas in attack and I would out my faith in Walker and McLelland, along with Newman, to make it happen. We simply have to start winning games and the time has come to try something different. The youngsters should be told to go out and play their natural game and they will not be dropped if they make a few errors along the way. They cannot do worse that those we have tried at half back.

Perhaps Muzzi should be given a run in the back row too.

It was interesting that Agar in his presser mentioned they have had to go back to basics to fix up the defensive issues (which they have in a big way) but that has affected the attack so they now have to focus on that aspect

Id give Mcllelland a run alongside Myler, that literally can’t be any worse than what were going with at the moment

I think the opposing view, that teams from 15 years ago would somehow walk it today, is delusional. Conversely if you put the current Saints team against say the Leigh team of 2005? we’d possibly see a record scoreline.

I think it’s a thing that occurs in almost all sports, we have the same with football fans constantly bemoaning the lack of talent today compared to 20 years ago. Again, I think it conflates quality with entertainment when the 2 are very different.

As I said compare line speed, defensive intensity, wrestle, men in the tackle to 15 years ago and it’s a million miles apart. As is the time and space therefore available to exploit by the talented players of that generation.

Could the talented players from then be top players today? Some would, some wouldn’t. Because the demands are different and the space and opportunity to express talent is so much more limited today.

You mention the Leeds, Saints and Bradford teams, here are some players from the squads of those teams:
Wayne McDonald
Ashley Gibson
Jordan Tansey
Danny Williams
Shane Millard
Jamie Thackray
Chris Feather
Liam Botham
Stuart Reardon
Karl Pryce
Aaron Smith
Chris Bridge
Ben Harris
Ian Henderson
Andy Smith
Marcus St Hilaire
Adam Watene
Stanley Gene
Matt Cook
Gray Viane
Ian Hardman
Keith Mason
Mike Bennett
Tim Jonkers
Andy Bracek
Ricky Bibey

And that’s without looking too hard. That’s a decent list of throughly average players. I think it’s easy to look back now and simply remember Vainikolo, Long, Gleeson, McGuire etc and forget some of the average dross that was there.

It’s also notable how much smaller squads were back then. Rarely did they have to use beyond a 25 man squad and when you think back it was much rarer to have long term injuries.

On average between 2000-2005 Leeds used 25 players in a season.
On average between 2013-2018 Leeds used 30 players per season.
2017 & 2018 have both been the joint highest at 32 players. So far this season I make it 29.

Regarding Ferres last night,How far can you actually run alongside someone without putting a hand on them before it becomes obvious that you couldn't give a thuck ?

A lot of them players would be playing regular imo in SL these days and they were fill in players for the top teams back then. Of course fitness and training and techniques improve over the years thats a given and we have to assume that the players from 15/20 years ago were undertaking todays advanced regimes as a given but if you do i don't see how you can make an argument.

He wandered around the field at the end of the game on Friday night, failing to acknowledge the fans for their support with so little enthusiasm. This is the rotten apple in the barrel. he doesn't care one hoot about the team or their cause. If he remains next season I for one will not be renewing our season passes. HE MUST BE GOT RID OF!

We signed an England international with Ferres. Remember thinking at the time he was a good age and an international back rower - just what we need.

He's been anything but. His Leeds career is coming to an end, thankfully, seein Clubb out pace him to score is all he will be remembered for.

I agree that he needs to go, and that’s been clear for some time.
I’m going to be controversial though: his Leeds career has been defined by a sequence on niggling injuries. It does happen.
I would question his attitude to conditioning through periods, and he is a liability for penalties which is his behaviour... but I’m sure he would have loved to replicate that England form with Leeds.
There are things he can rightly be criticised for but we should always understand that RL players are human too, and nobody sets out to do badly.