It is the downside of video refs. I would rather have one than not. However, I do feel that is a decision cannot be made within 3 attempts of looking at it then the ref's decision should stand. Problem is there are more angles than ever to watch the incident from than ever and that will add yet more time/complexity to the decision making.

I could pal but saw her post and went for it !

He shaved it off for an interview earlier in the year and looked about 12...I made him grow it straight back!!

he never looked 12 at 12!!!!!

I've certainly noticed that as well. It's certainly something that Red Hall should learn from, but won't.

The thing is, the video referee could be a fantastic marketing tool if used correctly - on some decisions it can create incredible suspense and really add to the drama of the occasion.

But watching somebody scroll a frame backwards and forwards for the sixth time to try and find an innocuous obstruction decision that nobody else in the ground can see isn't suspense, it's tedious.