I'm not looking at 'what if's'. I'm looking at what happened.

Mullally was pointless. We made an external appointment which was unnecessary. What we already had, in the shape of Baldwinson was good enough for that role.

What has Mullally brought to the table? Another big lad without much quality. He came with no hype and he'll leave with no hype. But the prospect of Baldwisnon excites, let's see what he can do.

Achurch milked out 4 years. These are the obvious wrongs we need to right moving forward.

In this case looking at the what ifs rather than what happened is actually really relevant because Leeds didn't sign Mullally at the end of 2016, they didn't sign him at the end of 2015.....they signed him very early in 2015 (around April iirc even before we had Galloway). They don't know yet at that point how Baldwindon will do with his full year at Fev, they don't know if our props will stay injury free the following season, so they had to make a decision there and then when he was available.

People keep going on about Baldwinson like he's the Messiah. He's a lad that's done ok at a Championship club but doesn't exactly have other SL banging down our door to take him. Why didn't Peacock go for him over Mulhern at HKR?

Mullally jury's still out, as with several others we've only seen him in a struggling team, if Leeds get going this year it will be much better to judge what he can bring, might not be much, might do better than thought.

I'd say the chances are Baldwinson will work out just like Mulally. So probably will Ormondroyd. That's just based on how few big lads actually make quality forwards. The point about last year is why the heck not give Baldwinson some game time? Its not like the alternative for him was playing U21s - he was playing against gnarled open age part-timers weekly. If anything there's more chance of getting physically hurt playing against that sort of player than supposedly full time pros.

I'm not hearing that. He was young player of the year at that level, so that exceeds the 'ok' write up you've just given him.

But he screams potential. He's our player, through our system and I'd like to know how he would step up if given the appropriate opportunity.

The external appointments of Joe Average's over our own crop in frankly boring.

You be a 'Achurch Man'. I'll be a 'Keinhorst Man'.

be nice for him to be given a chance before being written off

Not an Achurch man at all, can just see and understand why the likes of his and Mullally signings were made. I also, like the club have patience with regards to young players getting game time, a patience that alludes plenty on here.

Not writing him off but he's being built up as something special and all does it heighten expection when he does get a chance. And we know it only takes 2/3 senior games before young players are written off by many, like Golding and Lilley for being too small or slow or poor at catching and were being told they'll end up at Fev permanently and the Leeds academy is rubbish nowadays.

Joined Toronto on a two year deal.

Does this make him TMFMIC1 or just the most feared man in Canada or what?

i presume he is allowed into canada? he was always missing for games in the united states which many reckoned was due to his jail term

Must be. Hope the lad makes a real go of it. We never saw what he should have been regularly. I remember seeing him at Sidall against Halifax Academy and he and Chev were head and shoulders the best players on the paddock. A proper case of should have.