Yeah, heaven forbid the monotonous bitching about the coach should suffer some sort of interruption...

The restriction on subs is obviously deliberate - and part and parcel of what forges this team into a lean, mean big game team. You know - the type of team that regularly serves up the doubters a giant slab of humble pie.

I would agree with that and something Sutcliffe has yet to learn. On Sinfield I think he has settled in to Union really well and is bringing the best out of their attacking backs.

the best thing about the free union ticket was getting into the cricket. though kev still looked good enough to play for us the rare times they passed to him insead of kicking it away.

re other points in the thread , there were a few times when we were behind 3 or 4 were struggling to get back in the attacking line after hull had turned over the ball

macd had a long word in falloons ear just before the end of the match

answers on a postcard as to what was said

Probably told him to bring a cushion to avoid getting splinters for the next few weeks

Burrow played well obviously, the wet slippery conditions seem to aid his style of play as we have seen at OT on many occasions. That said, i still see him as impact sub but feel this performance will nail down his place at hooker for the next month at least, is that a good thing? not imo.

burrow has been running round in circles since at least 2011 but has had match winning performances in the play offs

must be hard to coach

As Biff said Friday's Bon Jovi conditions really suit Burrow's style (clear MOTM performance) where he gets some joy when threatening the defensive line with pace and footwork. Let's all prey for a wet few weeks.