Jesus.

That's the biggest load of tosh I've heard on here in a very long time.

Someone's going fishing

Bell end a are you what

Nice try but rearrange that if you can

Not great in any way, but still one of England's top performers.

Worst piece of trolling since about 2005 on here

Fishing

England succeed, "fan" fails. Dumb f******g thread.

Perhaps you are right and this is a debate which will go on for some time. I do believe Hardaker is the one who is yet to prove himself when out of his comfort zone though. Tomkins has experience of playing outside his comfort zone and irregardless of whether he's been successful or not (he has) at least he has the experience which Hardaker hasn't.

Anyway, appreciate the response. You're the only one who hasn't responded defensively so far. God help the rest of us who dare to criticise 'Sir' Zak Hardaker, the World's best fullback.

Wouldn't go that far. Tom Burgess, Graham, Hill, Roby, Williams, Hall, Watkins, Ferres, Farrell, Widdop were all better.

TBH apart from one high kick the New Zealanders didn't really test him.

Obviously Hall was used as a extra forward bringing the ball back like he does at Leeds. Maybe McGillivery would be a better option over Joe Burgess on the other wing to replicate what Hall does.

I agree about this.

McGillvary would have offered more than Joe Burgess