Have to disagree about Hemmings. He doesn't just big it up, he totally overhypes everything and is predictably repetitive. I find this, alongside his complete lack of comprehension of the game pretty tedious.

Would prefer Wells to comment alongside whoever gets the main job. He is, IMO, by far the quickest and most insightful analyst on the Sky team.

O'Connor is McDermott without the knowledge, humour and delivery.

He's the Paddy McGuinness to his Peter Kay.

Yep. I like O'Connor, I've met him a few times and he's seemed a nice enough bloke who I'd happily spend a couple of hours with in the pub chatting about the game.

But he comes across really badly on TV.


Maybe terrible was a bit too far, but I just thought he kept going on about things that weren't happening on the pitch instead of commentating. Probably not helped by having the random cliche generator that is Terry O'Connor sat next to him.

Stevo makes me want to put my foot through the tv screen (on a par with the late Bill McLaren and Ray (Mr St Helens) French. Now watch games with sound turned off! Clarke is unbearable.

I would like to thank Stevo for a lot of what he has done for the sport in his career. But both he and Hemmings have more than had their day and become a bit of an embarrassment. Stevo's good work in service of a sport he loves is in dire danger of being forgotten amidst his buffoonery in the commentary box.

Phil Clarke remains an embarrassment, mainly to himself. He seems to enjoy his "professor" role despite not having the brain power to back it up and his abuse of statistics makes me cringe.

I quite like Brian Carney and Jon Wells though. Barrie Mac is good value, but probably in small doses.

I assume there is still no confirmation/link to their supposed departure and all this is just hope rather than reality?

However,I desperately hope it is true.