Quote: G1 "Who decides whether a player is "marquee" and does it have to be a signing or could it be a new contract for a current player.
For example, could Leeds us the "marquee" loophole to stop someone like Watkins, for example, being poached by the NRL or union?
Frankly, I am against it but I know I am in the minority who doesn't crave big name signings each season.'"
You contradict yourself in your own post.
Your quite correct on marquee, and I think the proposal is to nominate a player outside of the cap, based on the salary paid. So new or current.
Surely anyone would crave the Marquee each year, if meant keeping of losing a player?