How the hell was that not a knock on??!!!!

Jeez I'm a neutral doncaster fan but how the hell did the vr not see a knock on there

Ridiculous decision.

Screwed twice by this new 'on-field' ref decision

The Penny try I don't mind. It's borderline whether it's obstruction or not.

The Ratchford one, I thought it was a knock on, but it's very very close. It all depends whether Ratchford's fingers are still on the ball when it first touches down over the line and I don't think the VR looked closely enough at that.
Ignore what the eejits in the Sky commentary team were saying, Ratchford touched it. It's whether he was still touching it when the ball touched the ground or not.

Yet another example of tedry from the ex-head of referees to not be able to see that Ratchford touched it. I make that example #5 so far from Mr Cummings. I hope he knew the rules better when he was refereeing.

Can't see the result as last week - wolves seem in total control. Leeds seem to be finding it hard to open them up

Can't even hear the commentary. Just from viewing both groundings look dodgy and would've been no-try's last year under the old system.

Do VRs have a time limit when deciding? With the amount of time he was looking at the various angles and the final shot he looked at I thought it would have been a definite no try as I definitely though the ball hit Ratchford's hand and changed direction.

Then the Try came up and I couldn't understand why he hadn't looked further on and seen whether there was an actual grounding.

Watching on my laptop so it's not the best way to view, but I thought it looked ridiculous.

Kicking game as good as ever

Third penalty from jjB

Quality play from the captain!!