Quote: ThePrinter "How is next season going to work? Are we to predict how the 12 will look at the end of the split? Or predict who'll make the 8 and how they finish after the full amount of league games and where the 'demoted' four finish in the mini promotion league?'"
Won't it be much of a much-ness? With the top 8 especially - if the points pre-split are added to post-split you will end up with a 'natural' top 8 based on the season overall.
With those in the bottom 4 that go into the league with the 4 championship teams, I guess the arguement the RL are putting forward is those finishing 9th and 10th pre-split will get a more favourable set of home fixtures than those finishing 11th and 12th.
I guess that would mean that (in theory at least) the SL teams in 9th and 10th pre-split are more likely to end towards the top post-split and therefore '9th' and '10th' if you added their finishing positions post-split to the top 8.
I guess whichever SL team in the middle 8 (including the 4 championship teams) comes top of their mini-league will technically be 9th overall and the SL team that comes lowest in the mini-league will technically be 12th. As said, the proviso would be that the teams 11th and 12th before the split will be more (theoretically) likely to finish lower when they go into the new mini-league because they will have been worse than those who were 9th and 10th before the split and the subsequent home / away split they are given will be a bit more challenging meaning that (again, theoretically) they will find it more difficult to win as many games as other teams...
Quote: ThePrinter "How is next season going to work? Are we to predict how the 12 will look at the end of the split? Or predict who'll make the 8 and how they finish after the full amount of league games and where the 'demoted' four finish in the mini promotion league?'"
Won't it be much of a much-ness? With the top 8 especially - if the points pre-split are added to post-split you will end up with a 'natural' top 8 based on the season overall.
With those in the bottom 4 that go into the league with the 4 championship teams, I guess the arguement the RL are putting forward is those finishing 9th and 10th pre-split will get a more favourable set of home fixtures than those finishing 11th and 12th.
I guess that would mean that (in theory at least) the SL teams in 9th and 10th pre-split are more likely to end towards the top post-split and therefore '9th' and '10th' if you added their finishing positions post-split to the top 8.
I guess whichever SL team in the middle 8 (including the 4 championship teams) comes top of their mini-league will technically be 9th overall and the SL team that comes lowest in the mini-league will technically be 12th. As said, the proviso would be that the teams 11th and 12th before the split will be more (theoretically) likely to finish lower when they go into the new mini-league because they will have been worse than those who were 9th and 10th before the split and the subsequent home / away split they are given will be a bit more challenging meaning that (again, theoretically) they will find it more difficult to win as many games as other teams...
icons077e_files/5454-3678dentheman-msnicons.jpgYour job is to say to yourself on a job interview does the hiring manager likes me or not. If you aren't a particular manager's cup of tea, you haven't failed -- you've dodged a bullet.:icons077e_files/5454-3678dentheman-msnicons.jpg
25511_1478008518.jpg"Well, I think in Rugby League if you head butt someone there's normally some repercusions":d7dc4b20b2c2dd7b76ac6eac29d5604e_25511.jpg
I don't know what to predict. If you'd have told me that terrifyingly ordinary Saints team would win the LLS and the GF I'd have thought you were suffering from a heavy concussion.
I predict that Leeds will continue to look disorganised and by May everyone will be very unhappy on Southstander (apart from the trolls who will be winding up the gullible "believeists"icon_wink.gif.
All views expressed are those of the author and not necessarily those of the RLFANS.COM or its subsites.
Whilst every effort is made to ensure that news stories, articles and images are correct, we cannot be held responsible for errors. However, if you feel any material on this website is copyrighted or incorrect in any way please contact us using the link at the top of the page so we can remove it or negotiate copyright permission.
RLFANS.COM, the owners of this website, is not responsible for the content of its sub-sites or posts, please email the author of this sub-site or post if you feel you find an article offensive or of a choice nature that you disagree with.
