Some on here are complaining about McGuire and his lack of leadership and control of the game.

I would agree that Friday was far from his best - something the likes of which we will never see again.

When the whole structure requires Sinfield controlling - quite correctly - on the pitch to expect anyone else to take this role even on a temporary basis is asking a lot. The same would apply if you asked Sinfield to support play in the way McGuire does. Its horses for courses.

Is there only me who sees Hardaker's future is at 6

I'm sure he would be a good 6 but for me he's too good and important to the team in his current position to be considered for a move.

No, he could easily do it. The problem is though, and what is more important, is that you could find quite a few stand offs who would be the equal or better than him. However, you would struggle to be able to recruit or develop a better fullback than him.

I hear a lot of people talk about Hardaker moving to stand off but I personally have never really shared the opinion. He's a full back, despite him being a superb defender and runner from the FB position, he still hasn't got the handling skills to play in the halves on a regular basis. Full back is arguably the most important position in the game and in Hardaker we have one of the best so why move him and put him in a position he'll probably be less effective, and replace him at FB with someone with less ability or potential?