Quote: Maverick Rhino "Nice one, "the ball itself being on the ground", being the key bit when combined with the adjudged knock on, as he would therefore have ruled that the ball came out of the hand forward (i.e. separation) so therefore wasn't "in possession" by just being in contact with the forearm.
(I assume there was separation at some point, I can't remember)'"
Yeah, that is how I interpreted it though if El Barbudo is right about Lomax then C) could, as he says, apply.
Of course it's individual judgement but I assume the VR had no duobts as, if he did, surely he would've given us the benefit of them!
)
