Quote jools="jools"No when child is the ref he sends someone off for an imaginary attack to the head'"
He sent him off because he thought there was an attack to the head, that's the point.
Yet on this occasion with another attack to the head he didn't send him off. In his head both were the same offence yet one received a red one didn't.
Are you intelligent enough to comprehend the incosistency being highlighted? Or do you need your fellow numbskull hudds fans to draw you a stick man picture storyboard, to explain it to you?