Totally agree. That's why I turned off at half time. I'm presuming you did as well

Andy Murray looked amazeballs didn't you think?

Foster was great.

Leeds pack was severly weakened and with mcguire and sinfield out it was much easier for warrington to pressurise burrow when kicking.

The team was completly out on their feet at the end. Your criticism of the leeds team tonight is frankly a disgrace. The simple fact is they did great in the circumstances.

You sound like a fan boy.

My criticism is just. Leeds were below average, Warrington were worse. Somehow, they still managed to lose.

Leeds were below par? What, missing first choice 6 and 7 and majority of the first choice pack whilst going down to 2 subs for more than Half the game, no?! Never! Ashamed, you should be ashamed, christ the crap on rlfans! The character shown by Leeds was a credit to them when most expected them to get hammered.

God have mercy on your soul.

They should all be able to go through the basic skills of the game. I don't give a crap about "guts and determination". I care about W's, and tonight, both teams were that bad that neither really deserved to win.

Utterly clueless.

Why, because I have the audacity to criticise one of the worst Leeds performances of the season?

People are talking like we had a team full of 16 year olds playing! We had our 1st choice 3/4 line, a "Harry Sunderland award winner and player of the series against NZ nearly a decade ago" playing in his "best" position and the future of the game at 6. We had experience in the pack, even when we picked up the injuries.

No wonder the crowds are down in general. A 3rd v 4th tie, no matter who's playing, should be of a much higher quality than what we witnessed tonight.

Utterly unwilling to look past your own team.

Your ''opinion'' is warped, I'm the poorer for having the misfortune to read them. Thankfully, no more. Ignore list.