TBH I'd rather strengthen our pack than a centre ablett has been outstanding and is pretty much one of the first names on the team sheet , very rarely let's us down and can be listed as one of the best centres in SL this year even though he prefers the BR
Although both good players moon and Lulia , taking into account they will be among the highest paid players at their respected clubs I can see why mr hetherington is reluctant to pay them more than say burrow or hall IMO I'd rather keep the squad we have than overpay individuals
438_1551258406.jpg"If you start listening to the fans it won't be long before you're sitting with them," - Wayne Bennett.:d7dc4b20b2c2dd7b76ac6eac29d5604e_438.jpg
In the event of other teams eyeing up the golden opportunities to be bestowed upon them by finishing 5th, the signing of Karl Pryce might just prove to be the golden signing Leeds need to nail that position instead.
Whilst I agree there's no need to recruit just for the sake of it.. the squad is very much in need of refreshing and improving to have hope of finishing top of the pile in the regular season.. it should be our goal to finish top next season and become champions again from there... GH is certainly right with regards to a signing only being made if it improves the team but he needs to make that happen!! Achurch should be a good one but the LC position needs a top class player filling it.. Ablett back into the pack and along with Achurch it's a pretty damn good pack again
I'm a bit meh with regard a new centre. We've rarely had 2 top centres at Leeds at the same time. It's generally been 1 top centre with 1 adequate/filling in. It's just for ages that top centre has been Senior on the left. Well we've still got 1 top centre, it's just he plays on the right instead of left.
If there is a good centre available for a reasonable price then great. If not then it doesn't really bother me. I'm more bothered by the pack. And I'd prefer we didn't pay over the odds for an average centre just so we can say we signed a centre.
All views expressed are those of the author and not necessarily those of the RLFANS.COM or its subsites.
Whilst every effort is made to ensure that news stories, articles and images are correct, we cannot be held responsible for errors. However, if you feel any material on this website is copyrighted or incorrect in any way please contact us using the link at the top of the page so we can remove it or negotiate copyright permission.
RLFANS.COM, the owners of this website, is not responsible for the content of its sub-sites or posts, please email the author of this sub-site or post if you feel you find an article offensive or of a choice nature that you disagree with.
