Speaking of consistency with the review panel, one could argue there wouldn't have been an incident to review with better officiating. IIRC, the Danny tackle came after a string of bad calls culminating in a shocking decision to give the turnover on the dragons line, despite dureau clearly playing at it. Pretty strong test of discipline that, in a big game when you are behind on the scoreboard. Even Kev went in on Anderson with a big hit. Kev channeled the frustration within the boundaries, Danny probably didn't.

That said, I'd still appeal.

Lost all respect for Wane. No need to voice opinion at all, esp before the hearing.

Not really any need for what wane said but it's quite funny that an idiotic minority actually think he is responsible for the ban because he said something in the media. When in essence all it has done has got you lot chomping at the bit and spiced things up a bit. Thankfully most of you can see sense and agree it was worth a ban. Although Was McDermott not trying to influence the decision aswell when he said live on national television something along the lines of "i hope common sense prevails and he isn't banned. He thought the player was taller" thats why he smacked him round his head with a swinging arm then... All Wane wants is consistency, and if there was going to be any, it warranted a ban...

You'll be a threat with or without "Maggsy".

Can't recall the exact figure but League Express quoted somewhere between 8-9K. Which I thought might have been a bit on the high side.

Looks like your Cabinet will remain lonely for yet another Season