Couldnt see from where we were sat but did see Chris Plume indicate to Ablett to come off when they were lined up waiting for Brough to convert a try he just shuck his head and refused. Disgraceful attitude from whoever the coach wanted to sub we only had to subs after losing Kirke and Delaney and the fact one of them couldnt get on the pitch because the player being rotated is just wrong Im not saying Hood would have changed the outcome of the game but if the coach wanted him on the pitch he should have been. To me that proved hes just a figure head and not in control of anything

That's very true but luckily for our right side defence Burrow defends on the left, which yesterday was unlucky for Keinhorst as he was called on to make or at least attempt to make 40+ tackles.

That's not correct should Catalans beat Wigan...in that scenario (and if we made it past Wakefield) we would go to the loser of Warrington v St Helens

Either way not confident.
TBH I am not looking past Wakey. In a good run of form, we are not and they are capable of beating us on the day.

Yes, but part of BOTH centres' increased workload is down to the absence of the extra defender in the middle squeezing them both in, rather than just which of them the hooker stands outside.

I don't think we're at odds here. Over-loading the inexperienced Keinhorst/Burrow combination was a no brainer as it would also lesson the threat posed by Burrow out of acting half once Hood had played his debut starting cameo.

How desperate must the CEO have been to secure a starting hooker when he knew he'd be unavailable in potentially key matches down the line. An admission of 'oops I've f[i**ke[/id up here' in releasing Diskin then Buderus without confidence in the line of succession... perhaps.