Quote Andy Gilder="Andy Gilder"Dave Woods handles commentary well, as does Eddie Hemmings at Sky.
The problem is that both need a level of tactical and technical knowledge sat at the side of them to inform the viewer, and neither has it on a regular enough basis.
John Kear would have been the ideal counterpoint to Woods yesterday, or even - despite his huge anti-Leeds bias - Brian Noble.'"
Disagree on Hemmings. He's the main problem with Sky coverage, turning everything into a false controversy and winding up the clockwork Stevo at the expense of describing what's going on in the game. It's one thing not having great technical knowledge, and another to get things consistently, wilfully wrong.
Woods, in contrast, is pretty good at his job. The BBC red button stuff after Leeds/Wigan was outstanding. A lot on the Bradford situation and the state of RL, with the right questions from Balding and Arnold, Ian Millward giving good quote and a very uncomfortable Brian Noble.
But Davies does annoy. A great player, but essentially negative in always concentrating on what he thinks an individual *should* have done rather than what a team *is* doing, and why. And the full extent of his "tactical knowledge" nowadays is "Kick early. Turn them around".