Quote: DHM "So the "Bailey" ban is now the gold standard for disciplinary rulings is it?'"
Not at all but if you read the previous posts they compare the two.
In my opinion Bailey was unfairly given 3 games end of.
The posters before me were comparing the relevant bans and I was explaining that the problem I have is that Bailey should not have been given 3 in the first place thus making Lestrange`s ban seem poor.
If it was Tomkins, Wellens or possibly Sinfield doing what Bailey did then IMO they may well have received a warning.
Because it was Bailey maybe they increased their ban.
Didn`t someone else not long after the Bailey incident do the same thing?
How many did they get?
It all boils down to inconsistancy by those at Red Hall.