Fair enough wearing the socks to support Sport Relief, but I think the pink hair must have been a distraction for the players, and management. How could the coach rollock the team at half time, when they looked like a box of matches?
Not saying the result would have been too different as Saints had a blinder. It reminded me of when Saints dyed their hair blonde when they played in Aus, and got thumped too.

That annoyed me too did that. Not content with attempting simultaneous orgasms from the commentary box they're now trying to rewrite the record books.

Really laughed at this



Leeds were crap tonight....pink hair or not (why did [uall[/u the team not sport the same hair do?). However I have to agree it didn't help in being convinced of the team's attitude to winning this match.

They were at it Friday night too referring the Wigan and Warrington game to the "real" grand final and the "other" grand final. Just don't get what there problem is with a team thats been champions 4 of the last 5 years!

Thought it came across as massively disrespectful to a Saints team who were very obviously going to be well up for that game. It may or may not have disrupted preparations but in my book it was unprofessional to even take the chance that it might - or to provide further incentive to Saints.

I don't have a problem with the Hair thing, it's part of team bonding and for a good cause. I do have a problem with the way we played (or didn't) and this is the thing we need to sort out, not the colour of their hair.

quality, the shot of them all huddled in the changing room. Looked liked a box of Swann Vesta. Poor performance by Leeds the match never really lit up.

Ill get my coat.

Dissagree. Yesterday right form the off was an attitude problem rather than a quality/talent issue. Their heads were completely in the wrong place leading up to that game. It doesn't take much to be confident of attributing some of that to the silly hair thing.

What started out as a good cause and the club trying to make the right noises, turned out a complete and utter embarrassement. They looked an absolute joke to a national audience.

You still on the "hair do crusade" Gotcha just like when you singled out JJB for his charitable efforts a couple of seasosn back how did that one end again??
The defeat was down to us been cr@# and ST's playing very well and no amount of hair dye can contribute to that.
Hair Do's don't influence how you tackle ,run ,pass or kick do they or have you unearthed a coaching gem?
Just to add this wasn't done 2hrs before the game theer was still plenty of time to "re-focus" on RL.

Nail on head.

I actually was pretty appalled at the petty nature of Eddie and Stevo's comments. The lads raised a lot of money for a worth cause. I don't think it had anything to do with our shoddy performance and is disrespectful to the quality of Siants performance to suggest otherwise.

We got caught cold against a quality and very motivated Saints team. It happens. It's happened before without dyed hair. It will happen again. When the Saints team sheet was read out I thought, that's a quality line up, regardless of their form.

Not to mention we had two of our best backs (and playmakers) and two of our best forwards missing, not that that excuses the abject display from those selected.

Still on the "hair do crusade"? That's my first post.

Singled out for charitable efforts? What charitable efforts? are you saying his mutton chops were for charity? or have you got completely confused with something else?




Don't dissagree with your usual narrow minded view. Which is why I concentrated on looking outside the obvious. And posted about attitude, as per:



If you dissagree, fair do's not an issue, but let's read the post properly first and actually take into context what was put.