Quote: Gotcha "Read again what you put instead of getting your knickers in a twist.
Your view was that Warrington only scored because of our errors and penalties. Yet the fact that Warrington dropped the ball, which is what gave us field position, was only down to Leeds defence.
You don't think that's biased? This despite Warrington making miles more metres in that 1st half from half as many play the balls.
Leeds did win fair and square, nobody's arguing any different, and I'm in agreement that the ref was poor. But you need to put down the superhero comics, because we weren't anything special. We got what every winning team needs a spot of luck.'"
We've agreed/disagreed on many subjects and issues in the past and i notice how you respond to G1 and some others who disagree with you when you get all fired up when you perceive their replys to be patronising and childish yet you do the very same time and time again.
Nothing is in a twist our discipline is firmly in our control and some sloppy offloads or "switching off" were all down to us now watch 90% of the Wire errors and you'll see at least 1 Leeds defender in their faces or hitting them hard it's quite easy to distinguish between the 2.
As for the "Miles more metres" we must of done lands end to john 'o' groats in the 2nd half because on the Boots 'n' all stats section they only made 12 more so who's getting their panties in a twist?
Nothing you originally posted says we deserved to win and points completely to Wire been this superior force IF they hadn't dropped the ball you and many others make them out to be.
Yes we made errors yes we were far from "perfect" but we earned that win and played just as good as them and in some areas much better.