Yeh because if sam didnt run to the right side and draw the winger in to tackle him...joel would have found the gap? Dont get me wrong, watching joel slap that bitch down to the ground was a very proud moment. and him making webb and peacock look amateur was special but that wouldnt have happend without sam..I just hope he destroys the aussies and maybe one day other fans will apreciate how special he is and how he will be the greatest player the SL has produced in the last couple of years..not like you can say it about any other player recently yet you lot prefare to boo him.

"and the reflex action that goes with it" LOL He's a cheat, everyone knows he is, what he did was worse than anything sam as ever done, Seen so many other fans agree with me (not all from Wigan) Not Wigans fault sam will end up tearing you apart!! Watching him run rings around Warrington was special..Just waiting for him to destroy leeds...There is a HUGE difference between cheating someone out of a play off game than there is sticking the V sign up to a TV camera when a) most children already know the V sign and b) Englands youth is a mess. swearing may not be apart of our sport...but when was cheating!?!?! Cheats deserve everything they get hence why not many wiganers had sympathy for mcguire. he's a dirty cheat.

Is he getting booed?

Yep. Must be a lot of Leeds fans that have made the trip...

But Ganson looked at it as the VR, gave the try, but didn't penalise Tomkins.

The way the sky muppets constantly suck his todger is starting to get right on my tits it's worse than they used to be with Wellens.

Fair enough really.

Nobody (bar perhaps Billy Slater) likes to see feet used in that way as it's an accident waiting to happen. Another RFL warning letter should suffice. The collection should be coming along nicely. He'll soon be able to do swaps with Ryan Bailey.

Speaking of Ganson he at least showed some consistency when ruling Atkins to have knocked on when tackling Farrell. The key to those decisions is whether the ball is being passed when the defender makes contact.

I don't particularly like the current interpretation but I like it even less when it's inconsistently applied.