There was another masterstroke by our slow learning coach. On 35 mins Burrow is stood on the touchline with his replacement number waiting to come on; Sinfield is binned I thought for a quick 22m tap interference, Burrow is then told not to go on so goes and sits down. Burrow starts the second half, Sinfield returns five mins after the break. During Sinfields absence Quins scored 12 points. We lose by 10 in the end.
Burrow should have been on at 12 nil and certainly at 14 nil. We were pedestrian all the first half and we needed some pace injecting into our game and a score before half time.
The final score flattered us, only Delaney and Pitts when he was on can escape critisism.
On the final whistle the team came over to applaud supporters in the away stand which was about threequarters full I feel because it is the done thing to save further critisism not because they appreciated the following. Their appreciation should have been shown by producing a determined effort; our forwards were awol throughout the match it was the backs keeping the ball alive in the last 10 mins when Quins were tiring that got us the final 18 points. Quins were nothing special, they did the basics right and were organised. We hashed up a glorious chance to finish fourth I only hope we don't perform the same next Saturday.

Except Webb who sculked off into the changing rooms, hoping, I presume, that no one noticed. He does this most weeks

Good summing up of the day......I can't argue with any of that. It must be an increasingly frustrating situation for Rob Burrow, as it is for us supporters, to be left on the bench until the sitation is beyond help as he was against Quins. Mac has to start Burrow at Wembley, and accept he got things badly wrong against Quins regarding team selection and tactics.

I'm going to go against the grain here. BM did the right thing IMO - picked a reasonably strong line-up to try to keep momentum going for the cup final. I would argue he should have picked his first choice 17 (i.e. including the absent props), but.....

That result has nothing to do with BM and evrything to do with the attitude of the players. Had BM known they'd play like that he would quite likely have picked an Academy side. I'm sure the team would have reassured him that they intended to build on recent improvements with an eye to taking some form into Wembley. As it is -IMO - they barely turned up, played soft and got beaten badly.

Is there a reason why Mac doesnt pick Burrow at 7, McGuire at 6 and Sinfield at 13 with Webb at 1 and Buderus at 9 a formula that has stood Leeds in good stead for years.

He is a bizarre character. Puzzled me for 3+ years in London

He has his favourites, your one of em, your in clover, your not............ your stuffed.

Sinfield has decided he wants to play 6 - McDermott has to keep him on side or else what happened to Smith and McClennan will happen to him. Once he does that either Burrow or McGuire has to drop to the bench and we have no LF.

Hang on - so you're telling me Sinfield got two of the most successful coaches in the club's history sacked because neither would play him at six every week?

Seriously?

Even by your standards David that's some conspiracy theory you've got there.

Can't wait to see Ian Kirke's stats this week given his role in that 17 selected.

It will also be interesting to see how Richard Moore got on given he's been brought in next season to take up some of the prop slack.

oh you tease

I've seen them now. Jaws will be dropping all over Leeds when the weekly thread goes up.