Quote: rhinoms "he mentions SL history but fax were docked points for SC issues i don't think Wakey ever were.'"
Wakefield were docked 4 points in 2001 for spending 74% on salaries the previous season (at the time clubs were only allowed to spend 50% of turnover) which was reduced to a 2 point deduction when the RFL decided to trade in the trusty abacus for a calculator and discovered Wakefield had spent 58% rather than 74% :
Re Crusader players: Ryan O'Hara would strengthen the prop division. Apart from that I don't think there is much of interest. Jason Chan perhaps but second row is well covered at Headingley.
Quote: rhinoms "he mentions SL history but fax were docked points for SC issues i don't think Wakey ever were.'"
Wakefield were docked 4 points in 2001 for spending 74% on salaries the previous season (at the time clubs were only allowed to spend 50% of turnover) which was reduced to a 2 point deduction when the RFL decided to trade in the trusty abacus for a calculator and discovered Wakefield had spent 58% rather than 74% :
Re Crusader players: Ryan O'Hara would strengthen the prop division. Apart from that I don't think there is much of interest. Jason Chan perhaps but second row is well covered at Headingley.
icons42da_files/4921-2354mikeypl8-msnicons.jpgScience flies people to the moon. Religion flies people into buildings.:icons42da_files/4921-2354mikeypl8-msnicons.jpg
All views expressed are those of the author and not necessarily those of the RLFANS.COM or its subsites.
Whilst every effort is made to ensure that news stories, articles and images are correct, we cannot be held responsible for errors. However, if you feel any material on this website is copyrighted or incorrect in any way please contact us using the link at the top of the page so we can remove it or negotiate copyright permission.
RLFANS.COM, the owners of this website, is not responsible for the content of its sub-sites or posts, please email the author of this sub-site or post if you feel you find an article offensive or of a choice nature that you disagree with.
