Its a sorry state of affairs.

He's tried to make fools of everyone with his 'comedy' persona and failed miserably. At being exposed he's thrown a hissy fit and flounced off.

You'd assume from that he'd either get the professional help he needs or, failing that, had another go with another id.

Yet instead he comes straight back without any effort to hide what he is anymore. Its incredibly sad really.

I may go with the ignore option too.

I've not really seen that much of McShane but the times I have seen him he's always been at Hooker - I don't know how he'd get on outside of the hooking roll.

Maybe the likes of rhinoms who follow the academy a little closer than I may be able to say if he has played outside the scrum.

We already know that Sinny can hack the hooking roll as he's proved for England so the one thing Bluey isn't short of is options for that position so it would be interesting to see if young McShane could play at scrum half.

Sorry, I just dont see the point of having Sinfield at Hooker and McShane at Scrum Half. I cannot see any logical reason for doing that. We dont need to try it as we know Sinfield can play hooker if he has to. Why do we need to see McShane at 7 when we know Diskin is out and we could do with another hooker.

I say keep the players in the positions where they usually play and dont be a Ranieri and start tinkering with things too much. Thats just me though

This has to be one of the dumbest posts ever on this board.

]


Hmmmmm.... That does sound like Fishy was bang on the money Bobby!

Billy owned again.