Have you not got round to creating/adopting a new 'comedy' persona yet?

Still championing McGuire for right centre? Proposing Ablett be dropped? Rob Burrow to be released?Claiming Mcshane & Buderus be played on the basis of current 'form' yet starting that particular crusade over a year ago when they'd managed 5 interchange appearances between them? Still ignoring anything that doesn't fit your agenda then crying foul if someone disagrees with your proclamations?

Its all a bit transparent in my opinion. The attention seeking octogenarian persona has surely run it's course.

Nice work on trying to snare Gotcha though. He's certainly not dumb enough to fall for it but everyone loves a tryer.

Gotcha,

I didn't attend the game. I was in the USA.

Then again, I didn't deride the selection of the fringe players who went on to help us record a vital and important win. That is the point I was making, not questioning your allegiance. Though your passionate attempt to deflect the criticism by changing the goal posts in duly noted.

FWIW, I am sure you regularly attend the matches. Just as I am sure you haven't a clue what is going on. Just as I am sure you spend you whole time there making inappropriate whinges about the players, a trait you then repeat on here.

Whoopppee for you. I was in South Africa the week leading up to the Wigan game, but still got off a plane at 13:55 at LBA on the day of the game to get to Headingley to watch the game.

You see that's why I feel I have a write to give an opinion, as I am usually there to form that opinion.



I don't wish to get involved in your childish games of posting usual nonsense. Put care to bring that post back up for all to see? that way we can see exactly what my comments were. I did not deride any single one of those 4 players promoted individually, I simply questioned their right to be there based on the =#FF0000previous weeks performances. A huge difference to the childish game your trying to play, and one that certainlg involves changing the goal posts on your part.

I agreed with that



Do you mean G1? that's who I quoted, he wasn't in the country last week?

When and what did I apologize about and what lie did I tell?



You had servere reservations about the young lads who would be playing due to their recent performances, I said lets see how they go in the first team, you predicted an 8 point loss but we won by 20, thats a 28 point difference, you must of been pleased with that? I just said that all I've seen you comment on the game is more critisism after a good performance



I didn't go to the game and I've never pretended I did, my reason for not going are no one else's business, I've never mentioned whether you went to to game or not so I'm not sure what you are getting at.



Gotcha I think you need to chill out, I said you seen very negative recently, Is that not fair considering some of your posts, I never critisized you for it, chill out man

Whoopee for you but I repeat I WAS IN THE USA. Not in the USA in the lead up to the game but IN THE USA.

Of course you have the right to give an opinion. Despite the insipid whining that you and nantwhich exile indulge in nobody has ever said otherwise. But when you post it on a public message board others have the right to challenge it. There's no need to cry in your beer about that and spout garbage about bullying, cliques or other such pathetic nonsense. In fairness to you, you have no problems sticking your head above the parapet, so don't cry if someone takes shots at it. When you post opinions as, well, as, shall we say, interesting as yours you're likely to get a lot of feedback.

Pathetic and your usual revert to type when your opinion is challenged. You cry that you have a right to post an opinion, that I am childish but in the same post you deride my opinion "usual nonsense". Soprano has pulled you on this trait a few times.

Pardon?

I never said you did. This is you getting all defensive and going off on one rather than reading and comprehending the point I was making. I know. That's exactly the point I was making. You question there right to be selected. they went on to record a vital and very important first team win. Do you not think that you questioning their right to selection might therefore be something it's valid to take issue with?Given your lack of comprehension I can see why it might appear that way to you. But if you calm down, read again what i put, think about it, ask a grown up to explain it, I think you might reconsider.

Just to clarify for all the neutrals reading this thread and to highlight the nonsense that G1 makes up.

This is the post that he is so certain of here that I was deriding indvidual players and writing off the team.



I didn't bring up the thread as in that very thread Gareth just arrives back and goes straight into critisizing a certain player. Showing the usual hypocrisy that when others critisise it is a totally different story.

Just to say, actually I appreciate your effort there to be reasonable, which if I am been honest it was. As was Soprano's post before.

But I still think it is you that as got the completely wrong end of the stick, and are using it to beat where it is not necessary.

I actually hate you.

A psychologist would have a field day with you. Firstly, the desperate appeal for some support and validation from any like minds with the "for all the neutrals". Neutral to what exactly by the way? You're already desperately precluding anyone who dares to disagree with you as being not neutral. A really desperate character flaw.

Then the description of my posts as "made up nonsense". They might be but as we all know should anyone dare to use such colorful descriptions about the stuff you post they're immediately "sheep", "clique members" etc.

Again, I repeat, you derided the selection of the players. That is what I have taken issue with. We're in agreement that you were questioning the rights of those players to be selected. Yet you're inventing things to have an argument with me.

Why not? Why were you being selective? What are you hiding? Why not link the thread and let "the neutrals" make their own minds up?

Do you have a link to me telling anyone they cannot criticise a player? or is this "made up nonsense"?

I am going to leave you again with this post, and ignore the above.

FAO, Gotcha, and I really mean this, I like it when you post. It makes SOuthstander really interesting. There's rarely much worthy of my esteemed time on here these days but you usually draw me out.

I used to think I was trolling you but these days i am not so sure. I certainly can't resist taking a potshot at your opinions so maybe it's you trolling me.

Either way, keep up the good/crazy work.

As for nantwhich exhile, he/she/it is just insipid.