Please correct me if i'm incorrect but I thought the "Quota" system as such had gone and been replaced by an inclusive system I.E. not how many over seas players per se but minimum number of home produced players being increased year on year? if that is the case then the previous comments about players being on quota is invalid
1230.gif“You are playing a game of football this afternoon but more than that you are playing for England, and more even than that, you are playing for right versus wrong. You will win because you have to win. Don’t forget that message from home. England expects every one of you to do his duty.”:1230.gif
27287_1532947987.pngBELIEVE. BELIEF. BEYOND.
IT AIN'T WHERE YOUR FROM, ITS WHERE YOUR AT.
SWMC Coach's very own timekeeping aficionado & expert stair inspector.:d7dc4b20b2c2dd7b76ac6eac29d5604e_27287.png
Quote: roo "Please correct me if i'm incorrect but I thought the "Quota" system as such had gone and been replaced by an inclusive system I.E. not how many over seas players per se but minimum number of home produced players being increased year on year? if that is the case then the previous comments about players being on quota is invalid'"
The requirements have been ammended to incorporate positive quotas on Federation trained and own Academy trained but the non Federation (Overseas) trained element is still very much a part of the overall package.
Quote: roo "Please correct me if i'm incorrect but I thought the "Quota" system as such had gone and been replaced by an inclusive system I.E. not how many over seas players per se but minimum number of home produced players being increased year on year? if that is the case then the previous comments about players being on quota is invalid'"
The requirements have been ammended to incorporate positive quotas on Federation trained and own Academy trained but the non Federation (Overseas) trained element is still very much a part of the overall package.
All views expressed are those of the author and not necessarily those of the RLFANS.COM or its subsites.
Whilst every effort is made to ensure that news stories, articles and images are correct, we cannot be held responsible for errors. However, if you feel any material on this website is copyrighted or incorrect in any way please contact us using the link at the top of the page so we can remove it or negotiate copyright permission.
RLFANS.COM, the owners of this website, is not responsible for the content of its sub-sites or posts, please email the author of this sub-site or post if you feel you find an article offensive or of a choice nature that you disagree with.
