Quote: G1 "Like I said, the objective was to encourage clubs to do what we have been doing for years and produce their own young players.'"
And how do you achieve an increase in 'Home Born Players' without a decrease in Overseas Trained players? You don't that's how, they go hand in hand.
As the RFL's CEO Nigel Wood explains."
I wonder where these 'players who are not academy, Super League or National League club-trained players' originate from. Could it be overseas?
As I have said from the outset the two go together. You cannot increase one without decreasing the other. Put the emphasis on which ever side you choose but the result is the same.
And in addition I'm sure you won't have missed the last sentence either where according to the report.....
That always formed part of my argument re the new quota system that the then club CEO's backed it only to sack it when it came to it's implementation after Gene appealed his classification. I can well imagine 'Mr 80/20 split' being to the fore in those discussions leading the case for reform yet here we are in 2010 and his own club is exceeding the overseas trained quota as the RFL intended and the club CEO's voting in favour of.
It surprises me not one iota to see the posters prepared to ignore these contradictions when they arise within the club that they support. They will, at the same time, be ridiculing other clubs for their reliance on overseas trained players and their inability to produce their own Home Grown players to the required standard.