If it's recreational and not performance enhancing who cares?

Hock shouldn't have been banned and neither should Newton if it's recreational.

The two-year suspensions are about right IMO. Depriving a player of their potential livelihood forever is too much, but there must be a deterrent.

Newton certainly wasn't on anything performance enhancing whilst at the Bulls.

Well, if he was he should ask for his money back.

The neanderthal inbreds don't like it up em do they?

Got a good 11 page thread from simply indicating if found guilty the club have to take some responsibility for failing to control their players.

Carnage ensued. Abuse, falling over themselves to brush it under the carpet, severe gnashing of teeth (one bit his tongue at one point) and then billy the kid got involved.

Bless their 7 fingered gloves.

Dont you ever stop to think what you could be doing now, if you had taken any notice of your teachers

Other forums sure seem to be a little more pedantic and tetchy than this one, and many seem to have no sense of humour or reality.

Personally I think anyone displaying clear signs of nervousness and twitching fingers would warrant futher investigation.

if you turned up to do your job pumped full off smack would this be acceptable ?

Don't be ridiculous. Of course they don't have 7 fingers.

They only have 3. Pointer, and thumb pinky.

Did Newton play a game whilst he was off his tats?

I don't take drugs but do drink alcohol nearly every day at work, normally in the morning but occasionally at other times.