| |
| FORUMS > Leeds Rhinos > OT Annoying |
 |
|
|
| Rank | Posts | Team |
| Player Coach | 217 | No
Team
Selected |
| Joined | Service | Reputation |
| Apr 2007 | 18 years | |
| Online | Last Post | Last Page |
| Aug 2010 | Jan 1970 | LINK |
| Milestone Posts |
|
| Milestone Years |
|
|
| Location |
|
| Signature |
[quote="Lenny The Loiner":edirthvs]Evening AP.[/quote:edirthvs]
[quote="Lenny The Loiner":edirthvs]Whatever AP...[/quote:edirthvs]
Ohh Dear, Ohh Deary deary Me !!: |
|
| Quote: El Diablo "I have to say that I do find long, that is to say convoluted and long-winded, posts, particularly on internet message boards dedicated to the discussion of Rugby League, quite annoying. I think this problem first came to my attention in the spring of 2003, when a particularly long post emerged on a thread discussing the prospects for that year's Challenge Cup competition. Now, in my opinion that was as valid a topic for discussion as any on the board, but I felt that the particular post in question was far too verbose, and included not only an unnecessarily lengthy discussion of the issue at hand, but also a very long and largely irrelevant section on the posters history with relation to the subject matter. In my opinion, posts which can be answered with a simple one-line answer, or a good old fashioned "yes" or "no" should be given precisely that treatment. I mean, really, who wants to take the time to read one of those enormous posts which just kind of rambles on and on, never really going anywhere in particular or really adding much to the point the poster is trying, in their own rather long-winded fashion to make. I think that such behaviour should be very much frowned upon, and I certainly wouldn't wish to see it encouraged in any way. Of particular concern are those posts which are, in effect, a single paragraph with no breaks in them. I think that is particularly poor form as an unbroken block of text of that kind can really make it more wearing for the reader, who may otherwise be more inclined to take the time to read the post in question, with any and all contributions that it may make to the subject at hand. Of course this is only my opinion, and there may be those who perceive a need for that variety of contribution and feel that there is value to be gained from all those words. Far be it from me to gainsay that sort of wisdom, after all, we're each of us entitled to our own opinions, but my personal thought, jhust to reiterate is that posts on message boards should indeed be kept short, punchy and above all, most importantly, to the point.'"
Bovvered | | |
|
|
| Rank | Posts | Team |
| Club Coach | 4129 | No
Team
Selected |
| Joined | Service | Reputation |
| Oct 2004 | 20 years | |
| Online | Last Post | Last Page |
| Aug 2016 | Jul 2016 | LINK |
| Milestone Posts |
|
| Milestone Years |
|
|
| Location |
|
| Signature |
10088.jpg
:10088.jpg |
|
|
Agree with Ricky, aslong as it's a well thought out post, why does it matter? Gareth usually puts his points across best with a fair few paragrpahs in each posts. Clear and concise and gets everything across. If all posts were like Bangs and Craigloiners one liners (and usually completely off topic), then wouldn't attract many new members would it. Saying that, I'm not even sure if the board does attract many new members at the present time with such off topic disscussions such as this one. Also the Original poster has not made many posts so this is probably an allias of someone else anyway.
As for Jord and Damo taking a shot at my posting style (it would seem the quantity, not the quality of it), I do feel I am not the worst culprit of this. if I was to write this in a short and snappy statement it would be "Nothing wrong with long posts aslong as it's not complete and utter e like what me and El Diablo have just posted" Obviously I could not have just written that stament on its own as I have refferred this post in that statement. Are you still with me?
Anyway to end this, I am on my way out and was watching that fit lexi on Emmerdale but then it went onto that val and got bored so I wrote this explaining the theory behind long durational posts on a messegeboard. I hope everyone who has complained regarding long winded posts have hurt their eyes.
| | |
|
|
| Rank | Posts | Team |
| Player Coach | 16166 | |
| Joined | Service | Reputation |
| Mar 2009 | 16 years | |
| Online | Last Post | Last Page |
| May 2018 | Dec 2017 | LINK |
| Milestone Posts |
|
| Milestone Years |
|
|
| Location |
|
| Signature |
44464_1476556895.jpg
:d7dc4b20b2c2dd7b76ac6eac29d5604e_44464.jpg |
|
| Quote: Invincible "Agree with Ricky, aslong as it's a well thought out post, why does it matter? Gareth usually puts his points across best with a fair few paragrpahs in each posts. Clear and concise and gets everything across. If all posts were like Bangs and Craigloiners one liners (and usually completely off topic), then wouldn't attract many new members would it. Saying that, I'm not even sure if the board does attract many new members at the present time with such off topic disscussions such as this one. Also the Original poster has not made many posts so this is probably an allias of someone else anyway.
As for Jord and Damo taking a shot at my posting style (it would seem the quantity, not the quality of it), I do feel I am not the worst culprit of this. if I was to write this in a short and snappy statement it would be "Nothing wrong with long posts aslong as it's not complete and utter poop like what me and El Diablo have just posted" Obviously I could not have just written that stament on its own as I have refferred this post in that statement. Are you still with me?
Anyway to end this, I am on my way out and was watching that fit lexi on Emmerdale but then it went onto that val and got bored so I wrote this explaining the theory behind long durational posts on a messegeboard. I hope everyone who has complained regarding long winded posts have hurt their eyes.'"
MMM Lexi of Emmerdale  | | |
|
|
| Rank | Posts | Team |
| Player Coach | 11658 |  |
| Joined | Service | Reputation |
| Sep 2007 | 17 years | |
| Online | Last Post | Last Page |
| Sep 2018 | Aug 2018 | LINK |
| Milestone Posts |
|
| Milestone Years |
|
|
| Location |
|
| Signature |
35138.jpg
Fat people are harder to kidnap.:35138.jpg |
|
|
For those of us with an attention span of more than two lines of text it’s really not a problem.
Being able to read also helps.
| | | |
|
|
| Rank | Posts | Team |
| International Chairman | 35189 | No
Team
Selected |
| Joined | Service | Reputation |
| Feb 2002 | 23 years | |
| Online | Last Post | Last Page |
| Jun 2023 | Jun 2023 | LINK |
| Milestone Posts |
|
| Milestone Years |
|
|
| Location |
|
| Signature |
1246_1686693825.jpeg
:d7dc4b20b2c2dd7b76ac6eac29d5604e_1246.jpeg |
|
|
Invincibles posts make my day, they are brilliant
| | |
|
|
| Rank | Posts | Team |
| Club Coach | 12106 | No
Team
Selected |
| Joined | Service | Reputation |
| Oct 2004 | 20 years | |
| Online | Last Post | Last Page |
| Oct 2015 | Oct 2015 | LINK |
| Milestone Posts |
|
| Milestone Years |
|
|
| Location |
|
| Signature |
10393.jpg
OBN Wannabe:10393.jpg |
|
| Quote: Invincible "Agree with Ricky, aslong as it's a well thought out post, why does it matter? Gareth usually puts his points across best with a fair few paragrpahs in each posts. Clear and concise and gets everything across. If all posts were like Bangs and Craigloiners one liners (and usually completely off topic), then wouldn't attract many new members would it. Saying that, I'm not even sure if the board does attract many new members at the present time with such off topic disscussions such as this one. Also the Original poster has not made many posts so this is probably an allias of someone else anyway.
As for Jord and Damo taking a shot at my posting style (it would seem the quantity, not the quality of it), I do feel I am not the worst culprit of this. if I was to write this in a short and snappy statement it would be "Nothing wrong with long posts aslong as it's not complete and utter poop like what me and El Diablo have just posted" Obviously I could not have just written that stament on its own as I have refferred this post in that statement. Are you still with me?
Anyway to end this, I am on my way out and was watching that fit lexi on Emmerdale but then it went onto that val and got bored so I wrote this explaining the theory behind long durational posts on a messegeboard. I hope everyone who has complained regarding long winded posts have hurt their eyes.'"
HIGH FIVE!!! | | | |
| | |
|
All views expressed are those of the author and not necessarily those of the RLFANS.COM or its subsites.
Whilst every effort is made to ensure that news stories, articles and images are correct, we cannot be held responsible for errors. However, if you feel any material on this website is copyrighted or incorrect in any way please contact us using the link at the top of the page so we can remove it or negotiate copyright permission.
RLFANS.COM, the owners of this website, is not responsible for the content of its sub-sites or posts, please email the author of this sub-site or post if you feel you find an article offensive or of a choice nature that you disagree with.
Copyright 1999 - 2024 RLFANS.COM
You must be 18+ to gamble, for more information and for help with gambling issues see https://www.begambleaware.org/.
Please Support RLFANS.COM
2.7548828125:5
|
|
| POSTS | ONLINE | REGISTRATIONS | RECORD | | 19.64M | 1,143 | 80,154 | 14,103 |
| LOGIN HERE
or REGISTER for more features!.
When you register you get access to the live match scores, live match chat and you can post in the discussions on the forums.
|
RLFANS Match Centre 
| | | There are currently no matches to display. |
| | Sat 2nd Nov |
|---|
| MINT2024 | 3 |
England M | 34 | - | 16 | Samoa M |
|---|
| | WINT2024 | 2 |
ENGLAND W | 82 | - | 0 | WALES W |
|---|
| Sun 27th Oct |
|---|
| MINT2024 | 2 |
England M | 34 | - | 18 | Samoa M |
|---|
| Mens Betfred Super League XXVIII ROUND : 1 | | | PLD | F | A | DIFF | PTS |
| Wigan |
29 |
768 |
338 |
430 |
48 |
This is an inplay table and live positions can change.
| Hull KR |
29 |
731 |
344 |
387 |
44 |
| Warrington |
29 |
769 |
351 |
418 |
42 |
| Leigh |
29 |
580 |
442 |
138 |
33 |
| Salford |
28 |
556 |
561 |
-5 |
32 |
| St.Helens |
28 |
618 |
411 |
207 |
30 |
| |
| Catalans |
27 |
475 |
427 |
48 |
30 |
| Leeds |
27 |
530 |
488 |
42 |
28 |
| Huddersfield |
27 |
468 |
658 |
-190 |
20 |
| Castleford |
27 |
425 |
735 |
-310 |
15 |
| Hull FC |
27 |
328 |
894 |
-566 |
6 |
| LondonB |
27 |
317 |
916 |
-599 |
6 |
| Betfred Championship 2024 ROUND : 1 | | | PLD | F | A | DIFF | PTS |
| Wakefield |
27 |
1032 |
275 |
757 |
52 |
This is an inplay table and live positions can change.
| Toulouse |
26 |
765 |
388 |
377 |
37 |
| Bradford |
28 |
723 |
420 |
303 |
36 |
| York |
29 |
695 |
501 |
194 |
32 |
| Widnes |
27 |
561 |
502 |
59 |
29 |
| Featherstone |
27 |
634 |
525 |
109 |
28 |
| |
| Sheffield |
26 |
626 |
526 |
100 |
28 |
| Doncaster |
26 |
498 |
619 |
-121 |
25 |
| Halifax |
26 |
509 |
650 |
-141 |
22 |
| Batley |
26 |
422 |
591 |
-169 |
22 |
| Swinton |
28 |
484 |
676 |
-192 |
20 |
| Barrow |
25 |
442 |
720 |
-278 |
19 |
| Whitehaven |
25 |
437 |
826 |
-389 |
18 |
| Dewsbury |
27 |
348 |
879 |
-531 |
4 |
| Hunslet |
1 |
6 |
10 |
-4 |
0 |
|
