Don't get me wrong i was just highlighting what i thought was a poor play just as you were with what he did well i don't think a fully on form disko would of read that situation the same way.
I agree and he admits it himself he's taken longer to adjust to his new role and he did start well in tandem with mcshane i guess it's easier to notice his standards drop when he's set them higher in the past.
Either way i think he can/will get better.

If I thought for a minute you were crediting Buderus with being the inspiration for Leeds late comeback I'd burst out laughing.

You're not, are you?

Not at all. Its a team effort. But Buderus organizing and movement of that team is far superior to the individual stuff that Diskin did.

Like I said, Individually I thought Diskin did well. But the team looked so much better with Buderus on than with Diskin on. Just has it had the week before, where again a large spell with Buderus off we were dominated.

Is that a downside to changing dummy half midway through the game?

It doesn't impact so much on Saints because Roby offers a different type of threat to Cunningham, but does changing dummy half (and changing delivery style of the pass, decision making etc) during the course of a game really bring more benefits than downsides?

100% agree with you.

It is not a Diskin put down. But Buderus is by far the superior of the two hookers. And since neither is an impact hooker, we end up with the scenario where the change is effecting the team.

There is most definately a massive reduction in any momentum we have when the change takes place. And probably would, as you are probably suggesting, even if it was the other way round, i.e. Buderus subbing.