Undue pressure on the joint of an opponent (21, Wheeler) in 59th minute.

59th minute according to


[urlhttp://www.therfl.co.uk/about/disciplinary.php[/url

59th minute tackle on the St Helens left winger Wheeler.

[url=http://www.therfl.co.uk/about/disciplinary_item.php?id=83559th minute[/url

The warning letter for Ablett refers to something that happened in the [url=http://www.therfl.co.uk/about/disciplinary_item.php?id=83227th[/url

Just watched, doesnt look much in it IMO

although the camera angles not the best for seeing it clearly, but theres no penalty, appeal from the crowd or reaction from any of the Sky commentators

Leave it out Leeds. The game's hard enough as it is without these type of tackles. No place for it, if proven. Benefit of the doubt for now.

Exactly. It's a cowards way of doing things, trying to injure players who, in the main, can't defend themselves.

Out of interest, how in the hell was the Gilmour/Smith incident dealt with appropriately by the referee?

Thats what it says. They have a case for displinary against Gilmour for the tackle. Saints got the penalty incorrectly. Yet the disciplinary decision is the referee dealt with approporiately.

How was it a disciplinary case against Gilmour if dealt with appropriately?

Are they saying that on viewing the game again that Gilmour was not at fault? If so why mention clumsy tackle around the head after tackle completed?

Because in cases such as these they reveal themselves as the referee apologetic buffoons they undoubtedly are.

And well done to Jon Wilkin for protecting an opposition player from getting an undeserved b[iitc[/ih slapping from Gilmour. That was nice to see.

Im afraid I clocked it live in the match - and mentioned it to "our kid" at the time. The saints player didnt react at all.


1 game ban

I saw our players a couple of times and I wasn't impressed.

benefit of the doubt, they're trying to roll the tackled player onto his back. Worst case scenario , they're attempting a chicken wing.

Don't like to see it.