So you often criticise yourself then? Congrats for being so honest.

My honesty, however, extends to the fact that I do give credit where it is due and make fair and reasonable comments elsewhere.

I can understand the Wakey fans being bullish about next season, they have put together a useful looking squad.

However a cart load of new signings didn't help Bradford & Salford last season, and many pundits had them as top 8 shoe ins...we won't know until next february.

I think both sets of supporters should just sit back,shut up and wait for the new season. Every thread turns into the usual bitch fest and its getting boring

So whenever we win games we are lucky because the teams are out of form and we are lucky but when he have a massive injury list of upto 12 players at a time those teams arent lucky? 0/10.

Not down to injuries....

There was a point last season we were struggling to put together a front row!
That kicked in our downturn in form, started off by Huby's injury.

I am sure Hull, Kr and Hudds are everyones idea of an easy set of teams to get your season going.

It wouldn't of mattered because you would of lost all the game you did despite who was playing, as I said you were not equipped for the business end of the season...FACT.

Oh no's, he's used FACT at the end of his sentence, might as well pack in now folks, game over man, game over.

Tell you what cockle, when you can differentiate between opinion and fact, then, and only then, will I attempt to take any points you raise seriously. </[ipatronise[/i>

I suppose your intensive research to conclude that this is fact has included head-to-head analysis of previous game performances of the main protagonists in opposition to each other, combined with those of the missing personnel against the same players. This will also have been done for similar playing conditions and time of year, of course. You will then have calculated the offset in performance and used these data to replicate, by some type of computer modelling system, I suspect, the projected scorelines of the games. I would hope that the information used has been taken from various previous years to compensate for one-off over- and under-performances in the previous encounter that you've used. This, to be honest, sounds like valuable research and I'd dearly love to see the models used and, of course, the raw data collected. Could you post them in response to this comment, please?

Thanks.