Through out the season decisions go for you and decisions go against you.
Where you are after 27 rounds is a true picture of how good you are or how poor you are.

I would have been gutted if Pelos try had been scored against us - no way was it not a double movement.

But then again, I'd have been more gutted if we'd scored it and had it chalked off - he bounced over the line and did NOT make a conscious double movement.

As a RL fan, I reserve the right to display considerable bias in the interpretation of the rules - in this case, I'm not right bothered 'cos it didn't involve my team.

I agree whole heartedly about the high shots - along with forward passes they are a blight on the game.

As for Cas - when you can get a decent pack and if you can keep your backs you'll have something to shout about, meanwhile you're just getting beat up too easily.

He impacted with the ground and bounced over the line. I didn't feel that he moved the ball carrying arm.

The problem was that we seemed to have every 50/50 decision go against us and in the heat of the moment the fans got frustrated. I would say that most if not all of them were the correct decision, but fans are partisan and will believe 50/50 decisions should favour their team.

What an objectionable and loathsome individual you are. Cant you conduct a discussion without the insessant abuse to other posters' that dont agree with you. its the Cas board not tigerman11's and anybody what comes on here are met with a torent of abuse from you. Are you really that uneducated that you have to substitute reason with the filth that you purvey from that sesspit of a mouth. You need to learn a few manners old boy and to conduct yourself with a bit more dignity and civility. It cost nothing to be polite.

Cheers mate!! We can debate we can disagree but we don't need to go down that route!!! Massive respect to you bro!! Proper rl fan!! Leg !!

well said fella. you are 100% right.

I can't see what point he was making to be honest. The Leeds game is of irrelevance.

the guy needs a good smack

Agreed.

its tigerman1+1 so yet AGAIN you see read what you want, and yes as you point out its the CAS board so why come on here and object with everything for a bite for a fish in general to troll, as for being polite to a bell end like yourself no thanks mate respect is built on both sides and i will never would never respect an animal as low as yourself, infact your behind a dung beetle OLD BOY.. and it still doesnt detract away from the point that you are still trying to troll on a point that i have prooved you are totally wrong about, highlight were i said we were the better team and deserverd to win.. your quote not mine!. or again are you typing bull 5hit as usual. it isnt about discussion its about lying and you have, and it seems this is something you are incapable of grasping...so when your ready bring my post where i said what you insinuate......waiting

You see here it comes again. You just cant help yourself with the obsenities' No one least of all me wants any respect from you, but dont you think it would be easier and also a lot less embarasssing for you if you dont mind me saying if you argued your point in a more civilised way assuming ofcourse that you can be civilised. Fwiw I could not give a t*ss what you say as far as I am concerned they are just the ramblings' of a cretin its the way you come across that I find amusing Oh by the way I am not your mate and I doubt very much if you have any at all with your attitude. Have a biscuit.

Yet another Cas/Wakey bitchfest, getting very boring, very quickly

Your just embarrassing yourself now, having to resort to personal abuse because we have a disagreement.

Obviously you haven't moved on or you wouldn't be having a rant on here about the decisions!

As for our game against the Quins, can you not find it in yourself to congratulate us on our pulsating last minute victory?

so what you are all saying that smith gave penalties againest just beacause he felt like blowing his whistle what utter bull i can't imagine you all complaining if you had won get over it