He could quite easily of paralysed Henderson, that kind of "tackle" has no place in any game, tough or otherwise - I bet you're not even allowed to do that in UFC!

I have to agree with the waki/hull fans on this one, that tackle was just plain stupidity, and could have seriously injured henderson..and as for the push on renaldi at play the ball!!what was that about??.He is a liability to us at times..He produces flashers of brilliance, then just plain madness takes over..Im not bashing him cos hes actually good bloke, and gives up a lot of time for the youngens, but on the field he frustates the hell out of me..!

Totally agree times up on Goldy and Hudson, shame been good for us but if were to kick on there time is up!

McGoldrick should have been sent straight off for that. He will, imo (and rightly so), get banned for a couple of games

Chase is a great player no doubt about it but the star for you guys is Widders. What a player, as soon as he came on he looked dangerous everytime he got the ball. He reminds me of solomona, not good to look at but awesome with ball in hand.

It's nice that we gave you a game because i seriously thought we would get hammered but the best thing for me at the moment is that both sets of fans are discussing/argueing about the game and not who has the best proposal for super league licences.

Good luck for the play offs, would much rather see your mob in the 8 than the cod heads.

Rangi is a star that's true and having more options around him makes those players more dangerous too - I actually though Danny Orr was our MOTM on Saturday, he was the foil in a lot of the good things we did whether he had the ball or just set up the positions.

Goldie's tackle was garbage, you have to ban that kind of tackle, I would expect 3 games minimum, but then again only giving 5 games for biting and Rangi (originally) getting 2 games for a punch means that the rules are all over the option.
3 games would seem right to me, dangerous tackle, regardless of the outcome, which was no injury and no harm done, you can't give a sanction based on the outcome..... Even if an injury to Henderson had occurred, which I am glad it didn't cos they're both great blokes away from the field, you can't adjust the penalty to match the outcome.

I think by current interpretations it was a grapple tackle, however the 'dumping' action is more akin to a spear tackle, although it lacked the lifting beyond horizontal required for it to be deemed as such. It certainly falls into the categories of a dangerous tackle and an attack to the head which could easily cause injury. There's a sufficient breach of the rules to dish out a multiple-match ban in my opinion, without 'making a new rule up to suit' as you say. I guess we'll have to wait and see...

McGoldrick has been let of with just a caution, so the RFL can't have deemed it too serious.

Cheers for that Bonz ,Makes it a bit clearer for me ,i suppose the 'dangerous tackle' wording can cover a wide spectrum of offences

Delboy66(aye of the tigers fanzine)