FORUMS FORUMS



  
FORUMS > Castleford Tigers > kits
114 posts in 9 pages 
<<   PREV  NEXT   >>
Subscribe | Moderators: Admin, pyeman , Hughies sister
RankPostsTeam
Player Coach556No
Team
Selected
JoinedServiceReputation
Nov 200519 years
OnlineLast PostLast Page
Jul 2014Feb 2014LINK
Milestone Posts
0
100
Milestone Years
0510 1520 2530
Location
Signature
TO BE FIXED



Quote: Ceebeejames "And if you want to get at the truth rather than bask in conspiracy theory ask your club whether they received the kit directive sent out by the operations department in mid May. And there you will see that the information that has now been posted is correct

And if you owned your ground you wouldn't have been told to vacate by your football masters. Wouldn't have been a mix up then, but hey ho shiny stadiums and all. Doesn't matter if you own them maybe that should come up in the sl licenses own your ground get a bonus point. k020.gif

RankPostsTeam
International Chairman12415No
Team
Selected
JoinedServiceReputation
Feb 200223 years
OnlineLast PostLast Page
Jul 2014Jun 2014LINK
Milestone Posts
0
100
Milestone Years
0510 1520 2530
Location
Signature
TO BE FIXED



Quote: Ceebeejames "And if you want to get at the truth rather than bask in conspiracy theory ask your club whether they received the kit directive sent out by the operations department in mid May. And there you will see that the information that has now been posted is correct

Do you have evidence that Castleford received and acknowledged that email? And that the RFL checked to ensure the information had got through?

Thought not.

RankPostsTeam
International Chairman12415No
Team
Selected
JoinedServiceReputation
Feb 200223 years
OnlineLast PostLast Page
Jul 2014Jun 2014LINK
Milestone Posts
0
100
Milestone Years
0510 1520 2530
Location
Signature
TO BE FIXED



Quote: marshman "I can confirm that the RFL spreadsheet had Hudds in home and Cas in away strip last night after the game had finished. I can also confirm the the RFL have since changed this to Hudds away kit, Cas home kit today. This is what we are dealing with, the governing body running our sport. What a set of juankers!

Edit- And thanks to Firefox saving my browsing history I still have the old file just to prove I didn't read it wrong yesterday.'"


I don't think this is a sport any more. In fact it's reminding me a lot of WWE these days. I wonder who's booked to win our game down t'lane next week...

RankPostsTeam
Player Coach1452No
Team
Selected
JoinedServiceReputation
Jul 200915 years
OnlineLast PostLast Page
Oct 2014Oct 2014LINK
Milestone Posts
0
100
Milestone Years
0510 1520 2530
Location
Signature
TO BE FIXED



Quote: WireWire "If you look in the operation rules, rule B 1.27 states

GEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEK!!!

RankPostsTeam
International Star258No
Team
Selected
JoinedServiceReputation
May 201114 years
OnlineLast PostLast Page
Jul 2011Jul 2011LINK
Milestone Posts
0
100
Milestone Years
0510 1520 2530
Location
Signature
TO BE FIXED



Quote: bootie "And if you owned your ground you wouldn't have been told to vacate by your football masters. Wouldn't have been a mix up then, but hey ho shiny stadiums and all. Doesn't matter if you own them maybe that should come up in the sl licenses own your ground get a bonus point.
I assume your post is a send up - you can't really be that dumb?

First :At the moment the galpharm is basically 60% owned by davy and 40% owned by the council. In time davy will sell 40% to Town. Even when that happens the enduring contract created when the stadium was built will protect all 3 parties. The contract runs for over100 years icon_biggrin.gif

Second:the new playing surface includes 'artificial grass' plus real grass grown from seeds. These seeds need maximum sunlight to grow best and that occurs in.....June and July so sadly your childlike theory is nonsense.

Third: If the game was played at the Galpharm the Giants would still have requested the alternate kit - this being part of an agreement to help out Cas back in February! the difference being that if Cas had turned up at the galpharm with the wrong kit they could not have borrowed Giants shirts for the game.

other than those glaring inaccuracies your post is fine. icon_lol.gif

RankPostsTeam
International Star258No
Team
Selected
JoinedServiceReputation
May 201114 years
OnlineLast PostLast Page
Jul 2011Jul 2011LINK
Milestone Posts
0
100
Milestone Years
0510 1520 2530
Location
Signature
TO BE FIXED



Quote: Bonzo "Do you have evidence that Castleford received and acknowledged that email? And that the RFL checked to ensure the information had got through?

Thought not.'"


You are getting desperate. Ask Cas if they got the directive in mid may. The Giants CEO has spelt it out in detail. if Thewlis is wrong why doesn't Wright put the Cas case. his silence is deafening.


And if they got no emails why did Cas fail to take 2 kits as the rules require.

RankPostsTeam
International Chairman12415No
Team
Selected
JoinedServiceReputation
Feb 200223 years
OnlineLast PostLast Page
Jul 2014Jun 2014LINK
Milestone Posts
0
100
Milestone Years
0510 1520 2530
Location
Signature
TO BE FIXED



Quote: Ceebeejames "You are getting desperate. Ask Cas if they got the directive in mid may. The Giants CEO has spelt it out in detail. if Thewlis is wrong why doesn't Wright put the Cas case. his silence is deafening.


And if they got no emails why did Cas fail to take 2 kits as the rules require.'"


I'm not desperate in the slightest, but as you profess to be all seeing and all knowing perhaps you can answer those questions and clear things up. My point however still stands and was merely to highlight the fact that there may have been an error in communication somewhere. It's apparent that the clubs and the match officials haven't communicated with eachother prior to the match which demonstrates a complete lack of professionalism in all cases.

What doesn't make sense to me is why both teams only had one kit - Cas didn't have both (as the rules require) but neither did Huddersfield, despite being at 'home'. One has to assume that a home team will have access to both kits and therefore be easily able to change should a situation like this arise - clearly had the game been played at the Galpharm this would've been the case.

Also, what bearing does the game at Cas have on this one? The kits for that game were switched but that doesn't automatically mean that the original directives are switched for the reverse fixture too. Communication once again - it's fallen apart quite alarmingly somewhere.

RankPostsTeam
International Star258No
Team
Selected
JoinedServiceReputation
May 201114 years
OnlineLast PostLast Page
Jul 2011Jul 2011LINK
Milestone Posts
0
100
Milestone Years
0510 1520 2530
Location
Signature
TO BE FIXED



Quote: Bonzo "I'm not desperate in the slightest, but as you profess to be all seeing and all knowing

[Where have i professed this, do tell]


perhaps you can answer those questions and clear things up. My point however still stands and was merely to highlight the fact that there may have been an error in communication somewhere. It's apparent that the clubs and the match officials haven't communicated with eachother prior to the match which demonstrates a complete lack of professionalism in all cases.

[Where is the lack of professionalism by the Giants? They help out Cas in Feb. Agree a reciprocal deal for the return game - if you do not want to believe this...don't. The Giants get the mid may directive that clearly states the alternate kit and have it at the game. If Cas did not get the directive then Wright can go public and simply explain why they did not take 2 kits as required.]


What doesn't make sense to me is why both teams only had one kit - Cas didn't have both (as the rules require) but neither did Huddersfield, despite being at 'home'. One has to assume that a home team will have access to both kits and therefore be easily able to change should a situation like this arise - clearly had the game been played at the Galpharm this would've been the case.
[Giants did not need 2 kits. they knew the kit they were wearing and the RFL confirmed this in the directive + Bentham did also. Why shoud anyone else have to jump through hoops because Cas fully or partially cocked up?]

Also, what bearing does the game at Cas have on this one? The kits for that game were switched but that doesn't automatically mean that the original directives are switched for the reverse fixture too. Communication once again - it's fallen apart quite alarmingly somewhere.

[First the switch in Feb shows that alternate kits may be worn at home. Second it links with the explanation that at the return game there was an agreement to reciprocate - as i say if you want to deny this, go ahead. third the problem with comunication is either between the RFL and Cas or within cas. the Giants were crystal clear on the issue.]

'"


RankPostsTeam
Moderator12504
JoinedServiceReputation
Jul 200222 years
OnlineLast PostLast Page
Nov 2024Nov 2024LINK
Milestone Posts
0
100
Milestone Years
0510 1520 2530
Location
Signature
TO BE FIXED

Moderator


This thread really does make me glad Ceebeejames is banned from the Wakey site.

RankPostsTeam
International Chairman12415No
Team
Selected
JoinedServiceReputation
Feb 200223 years
OnlineLast PostLast Page
Jul 2014Jun 2014LINK
Milestone Posts
0
100
Milestone Years
0510 1520 2530
Location
Signature
TO BE FIXED



Quote: Ceebeejames "[iLots of words, little substance[/i'"


I'd be interested to see evidence of such reciprocal deals after the February game and confirmation that Cas were in receipt of the amended kit directives. You're clearly happy to come on here and slate Cas when you clearly aren't aware of all the facts - none of us are actually. In fact, a number of the Cas players said on Twitter that we were supposed to be wearing white, which would seem to contradict your argument.

You profess to be all seeing and all knowing through the arrogant manner in which you construct your posts, and the fact that you can only see that Huddersfield can do no wrong.

Arrogance is something I hadn't ever associated with Huddersfield fans until last night when you all booed a Cas player as he was stretchered off the pitch injured. I hope you're all pleased with yourselves and your sportsmanship.

RankPostsTeam
International Star258No
Team
Selected
JoinedServiceReputation
May 201114 years
OnlineLast PostLast Page
Jul 2011Jul 2011LINK
Milestone Posts
0
100
Milestone Years
0510 1520 2530
Location
Signature
TO BE FIXED



Quote: Bonzo "I'd be interested to see evidence of such reciprocal deals after the February game and confirmation that Cas were in receipt of the amended kit directives. You're clearly happy to come on here and slate Cas when you clearly aren't aware of all the facts - none of us are actually.

[I have not slated Cas. Think it is a smallish problem. Just is not the Giants' fault]

In fact, a number of the Cas players said on Twitter that we were supposed to be wearing white, which would seem to contradict your argument.

[So some Cas players were misinfomed as well as your kit man....wow!]

You profess to be all seeing and all knowing through the arrogant manner in which you construct your posts, and the fact that you can only see that Huddersfield can do no wrong.

[ I put my case as strong as i can, that is not professing to be all seeing. Try and work out the difference icon_frustrated.gif

RankPostsTeam
Player Coach603No
Team
Selected
JoinedServiceReputation
Apr 200817 years
OnlineLast PostLast Page
Feb 2016Feb 2016LINK
Milestone Posts
0
100
Milestone Years
0510 1520 2530
Location
Signature
TO BE FIXED



According to league express it may actually be the fault of the RFL Quote"it appears the and RFL employee may have misinterpreted that information" this after both clubs were advised to wear alternative kit

RankPostsTeam
International Board Member15309No
Team
Selected
JoinedServiceReputation
Jun 200222 years
OnlineLast PostLast Page
Sep 2020Apr 2017LINK
Milestone Posts
0
100
Milestone Years
0510 1520 2530
Location
Signature
TO BE FIXED



some people have short memories, we remembered how come cas and the RFL didn't?


it was agreed in february when cas asked to wear their new away kit to "showcase" it on the first televised game of the weekly rounds, we agreed and so it was agreed that on the return fixture cas would wear their principle kit.so either the RFL or castleford or both forgot or chose to ignore this.
no blame whatsoever on huddersfields part.

surely cas fans remember this game??

114 posts in 9 pages 
<<   PREV  NEXT   >>
Subscribe | Moderators: Admin, pyeman , Hughies sister
114 posts in 9 pages 
<<   PREV  NEXT   >>
Subscribe | Moderators: Admin, pyeman , Hughies sister



All views expressed are those of the author and not necessarily those of the RLFANS.COM or its subsites.

Whilst every effort is made to ensure that news stories, articles and images are correct, we cannot be held responsible for errors. However, if you feel any material on this website is copyrighted or incorrect in any way please contact us using the link at the top of the page so we can remove it or negotiate copyright permission.

RLFANS.COM, the owners of this website, is not responsible for the content of its sub-sites or posts, please email the author of this sub-site or post if you feel you find an article offensive or of a choice nature that you disagree with.

Copyright 1999 - 2024 RLFANS.COM

You must be 18+ to gamble, for more information and for help with gambling issues see https://www.begambleaware.org/.



Please Support RLFANS.COM


5.96044921875:5
RLFANS Recent Posts
FORUM
LAST
POST
TOPIC
POSTER
POSTS
20m
2025 Recruitment
Rattler13
204
28m
Film game
karetaker
5727
60m
Rumours and signings v9
MadDogg
28896
Recent
Ground Improvements
Redscat
186
Recent
Game - Song Titles
Cokey
40782
Recent
Pre Season - 2025
Whatamidoing
187
Recent
IMG Score
Bullseye
82
Recent
Transfer Talk V5
Jack Burton
508
Recent
ALL NEW 49ERS ERA LEEDS UTD THREAD
chapylad
2607
Recent
BORED The Band Name Game
Boss Hog
63258
FORUM
LAST
VIEW
TOPIC
POSTER
POSTS
15s
ALL NEW 49ERS ERA LEEDS UTD THREAD
chapylad
2607
18s
How many games will we win
The Avenger
35
20s
Castleford sack Lingard
Another Cas
16
21s
BORED The Band Name Game
Boss Hog
63258
25s
Film game
karetaker
5727
48s
Its all gone a bit quiet
Victor
25
54s
DoR - New Coach - Investor & Adam - New signings
The Dentist
4037
1m
Squad 2025
Miserybusine
64
1m
Planning for next season
LeythIg
183
1m
Fixtures 2025
Bullseye
2
FORUM
NEW
TOPICS
TOPIC
POSTER
POSTS
TODAY
Salary Cap Changes Blocked - 11 votes to 1
Mark_P1973
3
TODAY
Fixtures 2025
Bullseye
2
TODAY
Spirit of the Rhinos
Jack Burton
4
TODAY
Mike Ogunwole
Wanderer
1
TODAY
Bailey Dawson
Wanderer
1
TODAY
2024
REDWHITEANDB
14
TODAY
Dan Norman Retires
Cokey
1
TODAY
How many games will we win
The Avenger
35
TODAY
Leigh Leopards - 2025 Fixtures
Bent&Bon
6
TODAY
Catalan Away
Dannyboywt1
6
TODAY
2025 Betfred Super League Fixtures
RLFANS News
1
TODAY
2025 fixtures
Smiffy27
15
TODAY
Fixtures
Willzay
13
TODAY
Salford
karetaker
47
TODAY
WCC Off
Choc Ice
11
TODAY
Leeds away first up
FIL
50
TODAY
Jake McLoughlin
Wanderer
1
NEWS ITEMS
VIEWS
2025 Betfred Super League Fixt..
1024
Magic Weekend 2025 - Back To N..
634
England Beat Samoa To Take Tes..
1358
England's Women Demolish The W..
1185
England Beat Samoa Comfortably..
1424
Operational Rules Tribunal –..
1208
IMG-RFL club gradings released..
1469
Wakefield Trinity Win Champion..
2007
Hunslet Secure Promotion After..
2210
Trinity Into Play Off Final Af..
2457
Wigan Warriors Crowned Champio..
2022
York Valkyrie Win Back to Back..
2263
Hunslet Book Relegation Play O..
2730
Penrith Panthers Secure Fourth..
2154
Wigan Humiliate Leigh For Gran..
2232