FORUMS > Castleford Tigers > kits |
|
Rank | Posts | Team |
Player Coach | 556 | No Team Selected |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
Nov 2005 | 19 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
Jul 2014 | Feb 2014 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
TO BE FIXED |
|
| Quote: Ceebeejames "And if you want to get at the truth rather than bask in conspiracy theory ask your club whether they received the kit directive sent out by the operations department in mid May. And there you will see that the information that has now been posted is correct
And if you owned your ground you wouldn't have been told to vacate by your football masters. Wouldn't have been a mix up then, but hey ho shiny stadiums and all. Doesn't matter if you own them maybe that should come up in the sl licenses own your ground get a bonus point.
|
|
|
Rank | Posts | Team |
International Chairman | 12415 | No Team Selected |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
Feb 2002 | 23 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
Jul 2014 | Jun 2014 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
TO BE FIXED |
|
| Quote: Ceebeejames "And if you want to get at the truth rather than bask in conspiracy theory ask your club whether they received the kit directive sent out by the operations department in mid May. And there you will see that the information that has now been posted is correct
Do you have evidence that Castleford received and acknowledged that email? And that the RFL checked to ensure the information had got through?
Thought not.
|
|
|
Rank | Posts | Team |
International Chairman | 12415 | No Team Selected |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
Feb 2002 | 23 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
Jul 2014 | Jun 2014 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
TO BE FIXED |
|
| Quote: marshman "I can confirm that the RFL spreadsheet had Hudds in home and Cas in away strip last night after the game had finished. I can also confirm the the RFL have since changed this to Hudds away kit, Cas home kit today. This is what we are dealing with, the governing body running our sport. What a set of juankers!
Edit- And thanks to Firefox saving my browsing history I still have the old file just to prove I didn't read it wrong yesterday.'"
I don't think this is a sport any more. In fact it's reminding me a lot of WWE these days. I wonder who's booked to win our game down t'lane next week...
|
|
|
Rank | Posts | Team |
Player Coach | 1452 | No Team Selected |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
Jul 2009 | 15 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
Oct 2014 | Oct 2014 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
TO BE FIXED |
|
| Quote: WireWire "If you look in the operation rules, rule B 1.27 states
GEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEK!!!
|
|
|
|
Rank | Posts | Team |
International Star | 258 | No Team Selected |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
May 2011 | 14 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
Jul 2011 | Jul 2011 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
TO BE FIXED |
|
|
|
|
|
Rank | Posts | Team |
International Star | 258 | No Team Selected |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
May 2011 | 14 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
Jul 2011 | Jul 2011 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
TO BE FIXED |
|
| Quote: Bonzo "Do you have evidence that Castleford received and acknowledged that email? And that the RFL checked to ensure the information had got through?
Thought not.'"
You are getting desperate. Ask Cas if they got the directive in mid may. The Giants CEO has spelt it out in detail. if Thewlis is wrong why doesn't Wright put the Cas case. his silence is deafening.
And if they got no emails why did Cas fail to take 2 kits as the rules require.
|
|
|
|
Rank | Posts | Team |
International Chairman | 12415 | No Team Selected |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
Feb 2002 | 23 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
Jul 2014 | Jun 2014 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
TO BE FIXED |
|
| Quote: Ceebeejames "You are getting desperate. Ask Cas if they got the directive in mid may. The Giants CEO has spelt it out in detail. if Thewlis is wrong why doesn't Wright put the Cas case. his silence is deafening.
And if they got no emails why did Cas fail to take 2 kits as the rules require.'"
I'm not desperate in the slightest, but as you profess to be all seeing and all knowing perhaps you can answer those questions and clear things up. My point however still stands and was merely to highlight the fact that there may have been an error in communication somewhere. It's apparent that the clubs and the match officials haven't communicated with eachother prior to the match which demonstrates a complete lack of professionalism in all cases.
What doesn't make sense to me is why both teams only had one kit - Cas didn't have both (as the rules require) but neither did Huddersfield, despite being at 'home'. One has to assume that a home team will have access to both kits and therefore be easily able to change should a situation like this arise - clearly had the game been played at the Galpharm this would've been the case.
Also, what bearing does the game at Cas have on this one? The kits for that game were switched but that doesn't automatically mean that the original directives are switched for the reverse fixture too. Communication once again - it's fallen apart quite alarmingly somewhere.
|
|
|
Rank | Posts | Team |
International Star | 258 | No Team Selected |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
May 2011 | 14 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
Jul 2011 | Jul 2011 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
TO BE FIXED |
|
| Quote: Bonzo "I'm not desperate in the slightest, but as you profess to be all seeing and all knowing
[Where have i professed this, do tell]
perhaps you can answer those questions and clear things up. My point however still stands and was merely to highlight the fact that there may have been an error in communication somewhere. It's apparent that the clubs and the match officials haven't communicated with eachother prior to the match which demonstrates a complete lack of professionalism in all cases.
[Where is the lack of professionalism by the Giants? They help out Cas in Feb. Agree a reciprocal deal for the return game - if you do not want to believe this...don't. The Giants get the mid may directive that clearly states the alternate kit and have it at the game. If Cas did not get the directive then Wright can go public and simply explain why they did not take 2 kits as required.]
What doesn't make sense to me is why both teams only had one kit - Cas didn't have both (as the rules require) but neither did Huddersfield, despite being at 'home'. One has to assume that a home team will have access to both kits and therefore be easily able to change should a situation like this arise - clearly had the game been played at the Galpharm this would've been the case.
[Giants did not need 2 kits. they knew the kit they were wearing and the RFL confirmed this in the directive + Bentham did also. Why shoud anyone else have to jump through hoops because Cas fully or partially cocked up?]
Also, what bearing does the game at Cas have on this one? The kits for that game were switched but that doesn't automatically mean that the original directives are switched for the reverse fixture too. Communication once again - it's fallen apart quite alarmingly somewhere.
[First the switch in Feb shows that alternate kits may be worn at home. Second it links with the explanation that at the return game there was an agreement to reciprocate - as i say if you want to deny this, go ahead. third the problem with comunication is either between the RFL and Cas or within cas. the Giants were crystal clear on the issue.]
'"
|
|
|
|
Rank | Posts | Team |
Moderator | 12504 | |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
Jul 2002 | 22 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
Nov 2024 | Nov 2024 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
TO BE FIXED |
Moderator
|
| This thread really does make me glad Ceebeejames is banned from the Wakey site.
|
|
|
Rank | Posts | Team |
International Chairman | 12415 | No Team Selected |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
Feb 2002 | 23 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
Jul 2014 | Jun 2014 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
TO BE FIXED |
|
| Quote: Ceebeejames "[iLots of words, little substance[/i'"
I'd be interested to see evidence of such reciprocal deals after the February game and confirmation that Cas were in receipt of the amended kit directives. You're clearly happy to come on here and slate Cas when you clearly aren't aware of all the facts - none of us are actually. In fact, a number of the Cas players said on Twitter that we were supposed to be wearing white, which would seem to contradict your argument.
You profess to be all seeing and all knowing through the arrogant manner in which you construct your posts, and the fact that you can only see that Huddersfield can do no wrong.
Arrogance is something I hadn't ever associated with Huddersfield fans until last night when you all booed a Cas player as he was stretchered off the pitch injured. I hope you're all pleased with yourselves and your sportsmanship.
|
|
|
Rank | Posts | Team |
International Star | 258 | No Team Selected |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
May 2011 | 14 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
Jul 2011 | Jul 2011 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
TO BE FIXED |
|
| Quote: Bonzo "I'd be interested to see evidence of such reciprocal deals after the February game and confirmation that Cas were in receipt of the amended kit directives. You're clearly happy to come on here and slate Cas when you clearly aren't aware of all the facts - none of us are actually.
[I have not slated Cas. Think it is a smallish problem. Just is not the Giants' fault]
In fact, a number of the Cas players said on Twitter that we were supposed to be wearing white, which would seem to contradict your argument.
[So some Cas players were misinfomed as well as your kit man....wow!]
You profess to be all seeing and all knowing through the arrogant manner in which you construct your posts, and the fact that you can only see that Huddersfield can do no wrong.
[ I put my case as strong as i can, that is not professing to be all seeing. Try and work out the difference
|
|
|
Rank | Posts | Team |
Player Coach | 603 | No Team Selected |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
Apr 2008 | 17 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
Feb 2016 | Feb 2016 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
TO BE FIXED |
|
| According to league express it may actually be the fault of the RFL Quote"it appears the and RFL employee may have misinterpreted that information" this after both clubs were advised to wear alternative kit
|
|
|
Rank | Posts | Team |
International Board Member | 15309 | No Team Selected |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
Jun 2002 | 22 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
Sep 2020 | Apr 2017 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
TO BE FIXED |
|
| some people have short memories, we remembered how come cas and the RFL didn't?
it was agreed in february when cas asked to wear their new away kit to "showcase" it on the first televised game of the weekly rounds, we agreed and so it was agreed that on the return fixture cas would wear their principle kit.so either the RFL or castleford or both forgot or chose to ignore this.
no blame whatsoever on huddersfields part.
surely cas fans remember this game??
|
|
|
|
|
|