But Cas have won all three he's reffed for them!

Edited for accuracy

Hope we give another good account of ourselves and push you close.
Att: 9103
H/T: 16-8
F/T: 44-18
MoM: Chase
First Try Scorer: Owen
Pantomime Villain: Mr Child.

A few more than 3 I'd say, and yes I'm delirious - no really.

And? That doesn't change the fact that he's crap.

No. But it means you guys will come away from the game with the two points which at the end of the day is what it's all about.

Total domination.... ie. winning all competitive games?

2004 and 2006 only since the start of Super League.

So the quality of the teams doesn't matter then? Well that's simple... we send the Cas High U14 team out and give the squad a nice rest before Monday at Saints.

Cheers!

I'm quoting 30 years as this is the period of time I've watched cas and in all those years playing them a win was a formality.From the first time we got relegated playing you lot has been a win either way for both of us,hardly dominion is it?

So basically if you win, it's through your own efforts, but if we win, it'll be because we've had help from the referee?

tbh i think childs stupid penalties will slow the game down which will help wakey, quick play of the balls and fast running from dummy half cut them to bits against saints and i think we would have done the same with a competent ref. Now the game will become slow and niggly which will suit wakey far more than us

Agreed.

With two evenly matched teams one will win and one will lose or they'll draw. The referee's interpretation of the rules may or may not have an influence. The only people who complain are the ones on the side that loses, and no-one will ever be able to tell if another referee would have handled the game so that another outcome would have happened. It's complete speculation.

People can gripe, moan and complain as much as they like about the referee, but one point to bear in mind is this: the standard of refereeing is usually much better when you're a neutral spectator.