Depends on how 'they' define market value. The fact that 'they' need it for their multi-million pound stadium surely MUST increase it's market value, and that should be taken into account when fixing a price.

I'd agree with your sentiments if it was someones house or garden, but in this case there is surely no sentimental value to the land?

There's a difference? It's the principle I'm talking about, here.

Can't let luddites and NIMBYs stand in the way of progress. As long as it's fair and for the greater good - trouble is you have to rely on politicians to make that call!

Nice attempt at a windup.

However, this thread isn't about my personal feelings on the wider issues of compulsory purchase. Unfortunately it was and unfortunately it stays, IMHO. Maybe we can thrash this one out over a pint sometime, but this message board isn't the place as I don't think it's of much relevance to Cas Tigers and/or the new stadium.

Magners please if you are paying.

Thanks but don't worry thats no longer a issue

YEP.

ahhh the polecats are in, dont forget to wipe your feet on the way in, and dont get comfy unless youre renting at GH

I'd support a merge.

Good idea.

Then you might be able to hold on to your youngsters.

You should merge with Hull KR, then you might have a squad strong enough to hold up for a full season