I didn't attend the game but from what's been said on here it doesn't sound like a penalty try should have been awarded.

As has been mentioned already by KR fans, unless the ref is very close to 100% certain that a try would have been awarded then he shouldn't award a penalty try. If Dixon didn't even have the ball in his hands I can't see how he could be certain that he would have scored hence it sounds like a penalty only should have been awarded - I presume one was?!

In the previous couple of games refs have made crucial decisions that have gone against us. Whilst the butterfly effect means you don't know whether Cas would have won had the ref given a different decision it's fair to say the decision didn't help in what were 2 very tight games.

As far as I recall, Morgan had a right old go at the ref in a game that KR were comprehensively beaten. I'd have thought that Matterson has at least as much right to complain in a tight game where one or two refs decisions could conceivably have made the difference...

The RL authorities should throw the book at him, after every loss he spouts up about the ref, it's becoming a joke He's undermining the the respect of the Refs. Even after been awarded 15 penalties to 5 against Huddersfield he still went on one of his rants. It's getting that embarrassing it makes me cringe!

Poor attempt at trolling even for you....

Try harder..

Hang on a minute, did'nt justin morgan moan moan moan 2/3 weeks back about the ref.......errr Mmm yeah i think he did.
All this moaning makes you/justin morgan sound like sore losers pfff

For those that didn't go, (Wakey trolls included) there were two SEPARATE incidents that we are all talking about. Some are getting confused and if you watch the TM interview on Tiger TV even he and the interviewer get things mixed up.

There was an incident in the first half where a kick was put through along the ground, Dixon ran through to score but was taken out by a Hull KR player, preventing him getting to the ball to ground it. A penalty was awarded to Cas for this offense. Some people claim this should have been a penalty try, others say it shouldn't have even been a penalty because it was shoulder to shoulder.

The second incident was in the second half. Cas were attacking and put a high kick out wide to the wing for Evans and Dixon. As the ball was in the air, Dixon came across and was seemingly about to catch the ball. Before he could jump up a Hull KR player ran into him knocking him out of the way and Dixon got nowhere near the ball. THIS is the incident TM feels hard done by, because not only did Cas not get a penalty, Hull KR then got the ball, two sets later were awarded a penalty and within seconds had scored the killer try.

As i say, TM and the interviewer get this mixed up on Tiger TV. TM is asked about the second incident and TM explains we should have had the penalty and goes on to say we have had some dodgy calls over the last three games. The interviewer asks TM his thoughts on the "penalty try" incident but TM still thinks he's talking about the second incident and not the first one.

A lot of robins are mentioning the head high tackle from sherwin which gave KR their first penalty...even the most one eyed, most biased, one sided, methadone taking, fish smelling, hull commentator said that the player (wellham?) slipped and ducked into the tackle. Not to mention the other various incidents that bemused the radio humberside commentators which went in favour of KR

You see there I disagree (sorry). From the RM stand it was a case of Welham ducking in as much as the cas player high shoting. Penalty enough for me.

You lot know how to spit a dummy don't you

OH for petes sake get a life all of ya, Moaning at refs, should be football coaches not RL.

We all feel we get the e end of the stick from refs, We were hammered in penalty count against Stains at start of season but never heard Nathan Brown come out and start whinging.

It evens itself out over the season and damn sure you and TM, JM or BN won't be on here spouting when a decision goes in your favour?

Get over it cos it won't change

Whoever thinks Sherwin should have walked needs to seriously watch the replay, The guys head was at waist height when he connected and there was no swinging arm, Sherwin is not an agressive HB, He wouldnt try and take someone out.

As for the incidents i spoke to Gareth Hewer who said it was his touchie who gave the penalty for dixon, And a penalty was harsh on Hull KR as it was just a barge, And there was no claim for a penalty try as there was cover coming across.

As for Dixon getting taken out AGAIN, He said he only saw 3 players jumped and he asked the touchie again who said there was no infringement so he played on, He didnt sound too sure of his decision when i questioned him after seeing the replay - So i would guess that maybe we had great shouts for a Penalty there