A very half-hearted response from a usually intelligent poster; I'll put your original rant down to having a bad day and accept the above as a kind of climb down.

One good thing has come out of this thread - WTW and Cas fans are united in their belief that the best part of neverdid ran down the crack of his mum's ar5e and ended up as a brown stain on the mattress.

He is one of the posters from both our clubs i could do without login in

I don't bother much with this board after he called me Alice, i can't sleep and its caused me to have time off work with stress.

My doctor is very worried about me.

Anyway back to the new roof/s, if we do get one it will probably have a leaky roof so we'll all still get wet.

Cheers! So you have got off your high horse saying Cas should settle outstanding (disputed?) debts (approx £1000 in total) to admitting they probably have done but may not have bothered to fill in a few forms.

I agree if they have settled the debts they should have informed the CC.

did you not read the rest?

nowhere have i admitted that they have probably settled the debt.

Quite the contrary,errors are not common,in over 20 years involved in commercial finance ive never seen 3 errors against the same company.So i would consider that these debts are not settled.
I also dont know of many companies that would have such an appalling attitude towards their business,that they wouldnt feel the need "to fill in a few forms"in order to protect their credit rating if they knew these debts were settled.

jeez i only hope youre not in business.

I see you hastily edited your original post.

In the eyes of the law they arent disputed,its already been disputed,thats why its ended up as a ccj.The court has looked at the evidence and determined Cas owe the money.

Correct but you or I do not know if Cas have settled after the 30 days/1 month deadline. If they have the ccj still shows unless a set aside application is made to the court.

You had better get onto the HKR forum with your little crusade:-

Date Court Amount Status Case Number Date Paid
26/06/2009 SHEFFIELD £533 Judgement 9SE07488 -
07/09/2007 KINGSTON UPON HULL £10,000 Judgement 5KH04694 -

I inserted the word "Disputed" because that is what usually sets the wheels in motion for a CCJ. I also put in the approx total of all 3 CCJ's you are so concerned about.

I look forward to reading your post's regarding outstanding CCJ's on the HKR forum.

How original ........... no really , you are a comedy genius.

Get a wash before you pay those taxes

belt up .......................... ooooh thats it ive shat meself , the unwashed telling me to belt uo pmsl some kids eh.
have they dropped yet ?????

With CT flying so close to the wind financially I'd keep statements like that to yourself.

CT have very similar financial outgoings to WT these days, with the added pressure of debts to directors, which the current WT regime does not. And as your always telling us your self funding your stadium build. So I guess it's not beyond the realms of probability to suggest the financial pressures are much great at CT than WT.

A very silly comment IMO, a financial crisis can come from nowhere & while I wouldn't wish than on CT I would have a giggle at the egg on your face! The 12 months previous that lead up to Feb this year were hell for WT and there fans, however with reference to you I would question what you think gives you the right to make fun of a situation that nearly killed one of the staple RL clubs & then you have the barefaced cheek to call yourself a "supporter" not a "fan".
I may not like CT in anyway shape or form, I do however recognise that they are a die hard member of the RL community and a necessity to the game, not to mention a big source of income for MY club. I would NEVER wish administration on any club or make fun of a situation that lead to the demise of one of the cornerstones of our game.

You sir are just pathetic & nothing like a TRUE RL SUPPORTER.