When is the next PP hearing for Wheldon Road?

Quote: Gazemous "When is the next PP hearing for Wheldon Road?'" A full Planning Application has yet to be submitted, although Opus have obtained approval from the planners that a full "Environmental Impact Assessment" will not be required. https://planning.wakefield.gov.uk/onlin ... L95QQ06E00

Quote: Gazemous "When is the next PP hearing for Wheldon Road?'" A full Planning Application has yet to be submitted, although Opus have obtained approval from the planners that a full "Environmental Impact Assessment" will not be required. https://planning.wakefield.gov.uk/onlin ... L95QQ06E00

Yes i'm sure it will be speeded up to a snails pace lol

Wouldn't said supermarket have to choose their site before an OPP is applied for?

As I understand the situation, there are a number of different sites all tendering for the same opportunity.
Getting the nod that WR wouldn't need an environmental impact assessment is a pro for your bid, but as other sites already have FPP for such a development is it really that big a deal?

Lets hope Tescos choose WR and not the easy option with PP already granted.

Oh i see you know more than us, what are these said sites that already have planning permission??

The ones ive been told of are the bus station( Delayed due to WMDC skint) Bus Depot ( does not have pp and involves knocking down a school( Good luck with that)) and Lambsons old site ( No pp and more toxic than hicksons)

so come on then or are you just Trolling / Hoping / Praying

Go on then Sandal

As Binks says - which are these then? (Apart from Bridge Street)

Jesus Christ, I only made a passing comment.

The tension on here is palpable.

Bridge Street was the one that I can recall, my original point was it's far from as straight as put in a OPP and get 15M, Tescos still have to choose WR- then worry about the problems of the planning system.

Hoping? - I hope you get one, always have.
Scared? - Of what? CT?
Trolling? - Got to spice up this board some how, it's as dead as on here.

...and that's as much as I will read.

No doubt the following posts are a tedious back and forth between Wakey and Cas fans.

The reason why it's dead is because most times that someone seems to write something positive about the club, there is a huge plethora of trolling, negative comment from people who just rehash the same old rubbish and all that sort of tripe.

Another reason is that when some of us try to have a go back, we get (not from the mods) a load of bile about having a childish set-to.

It seems that there isn't much you can say without people deliberately trying to talk it down, the Tesco comment in your original post being a prime example. The original purpose of this thread was to find out some information, not to be subjected to your third-rate spin-doctoring.

You saidsites already have FPP for such a development" and then you said in your next post "Bridge Street was the one that I can recall. You will now come back with some pathetic response about how I'm being too sensitive, how you've got more idea about the planning process than I'll ever know, how you can't tell us your sources because it's privileged information, and then you'll make up some pathetic little titbit of misinformation to get things running again.

That's how it works, and how it's worked on here for a long time now regarding stadium posts.

So, if you've some substantiated information, share it by all means, good or bad. If it's only your opinion, then to be honest, go and share it with someone who's thick enough to believe that what you say is 100% true.

Yup. He's got me started. Sorry

TBH if it wasn't for you Bren with your constant encouragement and support, I'd kill myself.



Thank you my darling.

Don't let me get in your way old chum...