It's also the responsibility of the home club to wear their home kit unless directed by the Match Commissioner to switch shorts/socks. In the case, there's a full clash then the home club can wear their alternative kit.

Read the paragraphs quoted from the operational rules at the top of the page.

Ok lets pretend you are right,why then did the match commisoner not make the giants play in the fax jerseys because he could not, its up to the visitors to change when there is a colour clash.

My god are you that thick? There wouldnt be a need for us to change our kit had hudds worn there home kit as directed by the RFL.

And if your still unsure/argumentative about it, check this link out.
rlwww.therfl.co.uk/referee/kit_directivesrl

When we played at Cas earlier this season which was also a sky game Cas played in their white kit and we played in the claret kit just to confuse things even more

If you play at home you play in your home kit.

Not strictly true. for example take a look here

Either way the Giants acted correctly.

It's caused a reaction bordering on hysterical that's for sure. Personally I thought it was mildly amusing.

Communications error or forgetfulness, there's no real harm done other than sky being inconvenienced a little.

To me it leaps out the words 'p*ss poorly organised' by Cas, Hudd and the RFL ......all 3 of them together. For God's sake amateur teams can do it, women getting ready for a night out can do it....yet we end up with a colour clash!

As simple as it is to those of logic. When each team submits it's 19 man playing squad, 2 days in advance, doesn't this present a good opportunity to settle/submit playing shirts/colours aswell.

No evidence at all that the Giants were disorganised. None. Either the RFL or Cas.

You mean apart from taking their away (sorry, alternate) strip to a home game, when the kit directive issued by the RFL in February clearly has them down to play in their home (sorry, principle) kit for this game?

No need to keep apologising.

The RFL have their directive and then they have scope + a procedure for variations from it. Just as Cas varied in their home game versus the Giants. Fortunately for the Cas vs Giants game the Giants knew what they were doing and brought the correct kit. HTH

Before we let you off the hook, other than just the hear say of 'he said...she said' feel free to provide the indusputable evidence clearing the Giants!

From what it says in today’s League Express it seems the balls up is at the RFL with both teams told they are wearing alternate kits. I'm sure the truth will come out in the enquiry. Huddersfield have given one side of the story. Interesting that nothing has come from Cas. Considering Dickie Wright releases statements for anything trivial I'm surprised he has gone quiet on an important thing like this.

I was under the impression that the away team was required to bring an alternative kit? This directive is to protect for balls ups like this. Who ever is to blame it's quite clear that Cas will take some of the blame for not turning up with an alternate kit.

Quote: the_grobs "Before we let you off the hook, other than just the hear say of 'he said...she said' feel free to provide the indusputable evidence clearing the Giants!'" I am not on a hook. i am happy to wait for official statements. In the meantime. take a look here and tell me if Cas are wearing their 'home / principal kit' and are the Giants wearing their 'away/alternate kit'? : www.superleague.co.uk/video/player.php?id=21204

Quote: the_grobs "Before we let you off the hook, other than just the hear say of 'he said...she said' feel free to provide the indusputable evidence clearing the Giants!'" I am not on a hook. i am happy to wait for official statements. In the meantime. take a look here and tell me if Cas are wearing their 'home / principal kit' and are the Giants wearing their 'away/alternate kit'? : www.superleague.co.uk/video/player.php?id=21204

You are correct.