Agree. Lets hope it does. I think its what happens after the match that might be concerning most people.

Go on then Sidnee, I know you're one of the decent folk but explain why the Last Orders pub just opposite Post Office Road is a "no no"

I take it then that your club will be taking action regarding the recent alleged "Racist " incident that occured at the Sheffield match?

Quote: 007 "I take it then that your club will be taking action regarding the recent alleged "Racist " incident that occured at the Sheffield match?'" yes www.featherstonerovers.net/article.php?id=7838

Quote: 007 "I take it then that your club will be taking action regarding the recent alleged "Racist " incident that occured at the Sheffield match?'" yes www.featherstonerovers.net/article.php?id=7838

Anyone wanting a drink there is a lot of us going to the Elephant Ponte Sat morning at 11am. There is some food, disco and Karaoke. There is some Cas fans coming as well, we have a token handful coming with us that we can abuse all day, dont worry they hold there own

New depths? i very mush doubt there was any racial abuse Menzie Yere scored a good try and showboated in doing so, so the crowd chanted "you fat bstrd" some Sheffield fans have heard this as "you black ???????" it was nothing seems nowadays you cant shout fat bstrd at a black player for fear of been branded a racist and banned for life. Out of interest you say new depths i heard a Wakey fan threw sss on Chase the other night, what would you say was worse that or calling someone a " black ?????".

Yes

702386


It is not certain yet that the allegations are in fact true. You appear to have read an account of an allegation made on a public forum or read the alleagation made on our own website and pronounced guilt yourself with no corrobarative evidence. Poor do.
There is a plan in place for this sort of behaviour. To air it would be daft as it can then be circumvented.

But your club WERE found guilty were they not???


As far as I am aware the criminal justice system operates within an "innocent until proven guilty" ethos. So far at least, guilt remains unproven with regards to this incident.

Racism is the lowest as is any discrimination,so you think it's ok to shout "you ***/***** Bstd,as it's not as bad as throwing urine on to the pitch,"you heard",none of it's ok,because it happens,does'nt make it right,not in my eyes anyway,in yours it seems it does.

Indeed they were,the boot is on the other foot now and it seems that even though there have been complaints,and Featherstone deemed it necessary to issue a formal statement regarding racist chants,you have put your blinkers on and deemed that the"innocent until proven guilty" line is the way to go,it's the old"Didn't hear it,didn't happen syndrome".Btw,I fully agreed with the fine Castleford received from the RFL,our sport has no place for discrimination of any kind.

Ah, the high horse eh?
No. You assume a complaint is evidence enough of guilt??? It isn't.
If it happens and the club is found guilty, I hope the perpetrators are dealt with accordingly.
However, are you suggesting we should act without evidence. The club is pro-active in seeking out the people we don't want at our club and have issued a number of bans this last season/closed season. Have Cas???

Similarly, the club are committed to inverstigating complaints thoroughly. In my experience the club have been too tight on some and have indeed banned people with the flimsiest of grounds - but hey ho, that's the world we live in.

Of course the club issued a formal statement. It would be crass not to if they have rec'd a formal complaint. We have to be shown to be pro-active in investigating/dealing with this matter.

I was at the game. I didn't hear owt. If I had I would have dealt with it. I work with friends/colleagues who are of ethnic minorities, gay/lesbian and from different religious backgrounds. I abhor racism of any kind and like your comment I find it absolutely unnecessary - it's criminal. However, if it didn't happen, it didn't happen.

Your whole post smack of resentment. i.e. "great, Fev have a complaint re racism - that's ammunition to have a go at Fev" regardless of guilt being proven!!

As I said owd cock, If guilt is indeed proven, I won't moan if the guilty one's are never seen at Post Office Road again. But to assume guilt as you are doing, says far more about yourself, than it does of me!!

Incidently 007, not surprisingly I was called a Fat Ginger B'stard by several cas fans on your last visit to Post Office Road. Not that it bothers me and I certainly didn't make any formal complaints to Castleford RLFC.

Just in your opinion, what's the difference between calling someone a "fat ginger b'stard" and a black b'stard??

Genuine question and not aimed at any points scoring excercise.

How do the two compare in your mind???

PS I am in fact - Big, Fat and I have ginger hair!!!

In my eyes both wrong,one is said to hurt on a personal level(as in a school bully,which is what those "people" who called you are) the other is used as a discriminatory statement to a persons colour /creed/origin,one is not a criminal offence,the other one is,and no moral high ground with me,if it's wrong,it's wrong,but you can't say that there has been no incident and then say that the club have to be seen to be proactive regarding the incident,btw,I'm 6'1 large and not ginger.
FWIW If I wanted to take the moral high ground I could have quite easily mentioned an incident which involved,allegedly,Featherstone "supporters"2 years ago,I didn't so for you to bring up past indiscretions in its own way is points scoring,Castleford were rightly punished for what happened,it's over,this is the now,and if any CTRLFC "supporters" are found to have been involved in any of the incidents last week,then if it warrants a life ban,then ban them,no grey area.

Nothing like putting words into someones mouth is there, i never said it was ok to shout that did i, you said we had sank new depths i was just pointing out throwing urine on someone is worse in my opinion

Why??
The cllub have received a formal complaint. . A pro-active response is not only desireable, it's essential for the good of everything that's right.

It's assumes no guilt. If the evidence is there and the allegation is proven - we must act with a degree of immediacy. The statement does not imply the allegation is a true record of what happened. As my daft mate gingdong implied, comments can be misheard. A malicious complaint can be made (and before you say it can't - it has happened at Cas at least once since the GT incident), it can be simply an untruth.

If anyone at Post Office Road is found to be guilty of racial abuse I hope they are dealt with accordingly.

I abhor all elements of marginisation, racial or otherwise. But I also believe in the fundamental principle of 'innocent until proven guilty'.

Comments assuming guilt when it is not proven helps no-one.